Literature DB >> 8942312

Age comparisons of serial position effects in short-term memory.

M S Korsnes1, S Magnussen.   

Abstract

Memory for serial position in four-item lists of words or abstract designs was tested at retention intervals of 5-25 seconds in two subject groups, aged 25-35 and 60-75 years; accuracy and choice reaction times (RT) were recorded. Increasing the retention interval transformed the serial position curve from recency to primacy but produced no overall reduction in memory performance in terms of accuracy. RTs varied as a function of both serial position and retention interval. Under all conditions the memory of older subjects was less accurate and they exhibited longer RTs compared to young subjects, but the age differences did not interact with list position or retention interval for either response indicator. The results suggest that age differences in memory can be explained by a single factor of mental speed limiting encoding efficiency and affecting decision times.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942312     DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00056-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  5 in total

1.  Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive impairments.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; James Neuse; Stephen Madigan; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of age on measures of complex working memory span in the beagle dog (Canis familiaris) using two versions of a spatial list learning paradigm.

Authors:  P Dwight Tapp; Christina T Siwak; Jimena Estrada; Daniel Holowachuk; Norton W Milgram
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Monkey auditory list memory: tests with mixed and blocked retention delays.

Authors:  Anthony A Wright
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-05

4.  Associative-memory deficit as a function of age and stimuli serial position.

Authors:  Jonathan Guez; Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy; Yael Poznanski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Do aging and dual-tasking impair the capacity to store and retrieve visuospatial information needed to guide perturbation-evoked reach-to-grasp reactions?

Authors:  Kenneth C Cheng; Jay Pratt; Brian E Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.