Literature DB >> 8942122

A survey of pain in patients with advanced cancer.

R Twycross1, J Harcourt, S Bergl.   

Abstract

One hundred eleven patients with advanced cancer and pain newly referred to a palliative care center completed the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) weekly for up to 4 weeks. The aims were (a) to review the numbers and causes of pain, (b) to consider the usefulness of the BPI in the evaluation of pain in cancer patients, and (c) to determine the impact of treatment. A total of 370 pains were recorded initially, a median of 3 per patient; 85% had more than 1 pain and more than 40% had 4 or more pains. Causes of pain were cancer (46%), debility (29%), treatment (5%), concurrent disorder (8%), and no stated cause (12%). The top 10 individual causes accounted for 73% of the pains. Seventy-six (68%) of the patients completed two BRIs, but only 46 (41%) completed 5. After 4 weeks, the median number of pains had fallen to 1.5; 78% still had more than 1 pain, but only 20% had 4 or more pains. Intensity of pain also declined, particularly in the first 2 weeks. With their last BPI, 23% had become completely pain free and a further 27% achieved acceptable relief (worst pain scores 1-4), compared with none and 24% initially. Of those who completed all five BPIs, the final respective figures were 22% and 29%. In contrast, 23% of patients still had unacceptable severe pain noted on their last BPI (worst pain scores 8-10), compared with 36% initially. Of those who completed five BPIs, the final figure was 20%. Highly significant correlations were observed between all seven interference factors and present, worst, and average pain intensities. After 4 weeks, the pattern was more variable, particularly in relation to present pain, suggesting that interference factors may have a limited utility as a measure of satisfactory pain management. Many patients did not answer all the questions in the BPI. It was concluded that the BPI is not brief enough for routine clinical use, and that the short form of the BPI (BPI-SF) is too short. A pain diary card will be developed comprising mainly pain scores, a pain relief score and a satisfaction with pain management score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8942122     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00149-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  23 in total

1.  Appropriate time frames for data collection in quality of life research among cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Massage therapy versus simple touch to improve pain and mood in patients with advanced cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jean S Kutner; Marlaine C Smith; Lisa Corbin; Linnea Hemphill; Kathryn Benton; B Karen Mellis; Brenda Beaty; Sue Felton; Traci E Yamashita; Lucinda L Bryant; Diane L Fairclough
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  The cancer pain experience of Israeli adults 65 years and older: the influence of pain interference, symptom severity, and knowledge and attitudes on pain and pain control.

Authors:  Marlene Z Cohen; Catherine F Musgrave; Deborah B McGuire; Neville E Strumpf; Mark F Munsell; Tito R Mendoza; Maya Gips
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-02-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Post hoc analysis of pregabalin vs. non-pregabalin treatment in patients with cancer-related neuropathic pain: better pain relief, sleep and physical health.

Authors:  Ana Mańas; Juan Pablo Ciria; María Carmen Fernández; María Luisa Gonzálvez; Virginia Morillo; María Pérez; Xavier Masramon; Vanessa López-Gómez
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Nociceptive and neuropathic pain in patients with lung cancer: a comparison of pain quality descriptors.

Authors:  D J Wilkie; H Y Huang; N Reilly; K C Cain
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Minimal clinically important differences in the brief pain inventory in patients with bone metastases.

Authors:  Karrie Wong; Liang Zeng; Liying Zhang; Gillian Bedard; Erin Wong; May Tsao; Elizabeth Barnes; Cyril Danjoux; Arjun Sahgal; Lori Holden; Natalie Lauzon; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Cancer-related pain in older adults receiving palliative care: patient and family caregiver perspectives on the experience of pain.

Authors:  Christine J McPherson; Thomas Hadjistavropoulos; Michelle M Lobchuk; Kelly N Kilgour
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.037

8.  Smoking status and pain level among head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Henrietta L Logan; Roger B Fillingim; Linda M Bartoshuk; Pamela Sandow; Scott L Tomar; John W Werning; William M Mendenhall
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Development of a novel location-based assessment of sensory symptoms in cancer patients: preliminary reliability and validity assessment.

Authors:  Adam R Burkey; Peter A Kanetsky
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Suspected malignant cord compression - improving time to diagnosis via a 'hotline': a prospective audit.

Authors:  L Allan; L Baker; J Dewar; S Eljamel; R M Grant; J G Houston; T McLeay; A J Munro; P Levack
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.