Literature DB >> 8941860

Deficits of attention after closed-head injury: slowness only?

J M Spikman1, A H van Zomeren, B G Deelman.   

Abstract

The performance of a group of 60 severely closed-head-injured patients in the subacute stage of recovery on a series of tests addressing focused, divided, and sustained attention, and supervisory attentional control was compared to the performance of a matched group of 60 healthy controls. Patients performed significantly worse on each test with time pressure (those addressing focused and divided attention), indicating basic slowness of information processing, and on the self-paced tasks for supervisory attentional control. No indication was found of a sustained attention deficit. In a subsequent analysis the influence of the demonstrated slowness of information processing and other possibly confounding cognitive factors was controlled for by means of covariance analyses. This resulted in a disappearance of group differences on tests for focused and divided attention. The only difference that remained concerned a test for supervisory attentional control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8941860     DOI: 10.1080/01688639608408298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  13 in total

Review 1.  Cognitive event-related potentials in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  I Reinvang
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  A normative study on visual reaction times and two Stroop colour-word tests.

Authors:  R Barbarotto; M Laiacona; R Frosio; M Vecchio; A Farinato; E Capitani
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-06

3.  Tau and Amyloid-β Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers have Differential Relationships with Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Charles B Malpas; Michael M Saling; Dennis Velakoulis; Patricia Desmond; Terence J O'Brien
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population.

Authors:  P Haggard; J Cockburn; J Cock; C Fordham; D Wade
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Reaction time and cognitive-linguistic performance in adults with mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Rocío S Norman; Manish N Shah; Lyn S Turkstra
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  The influence of mild traumatic brain injury on the temporal distribution of attention.

Authors:  Alicia McIntire; Jeanne Langan; Charlene Halterman; Anthony Drew; Louis Osternig; Li-Shan Chou; Paul van Donkelaar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A computerized test battery sensitive to mild and severe brain injury.

Authors:  C Thomas Gualtieri; Lynda G Johnson
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2008-04-15

8.  Multitasking costs in close-head injury patients. A fine-grained analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Dell'Acqua; Harold Pashler; Franca Stablum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Focused and divided attention abilities in the acute phase of recovery from moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kayela Robertson; Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Brain activity patterns uniquely supporting visual feature integration after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Anjali Raja Beharelle; Danielle Tisserand; Donald T Stuss; Anthony R McIntosh; Brian Levine
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.