Literature DB >> 8941241

Case survey of management of cellulitis in a tertiary teaching hospital.

A A Aly1, N M Roberts, K S Seipol, D G MacLellan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine management of cellulitis in a tertiary teaching hospital, identify inefficiencies and suggest revised management guidelines.
DESIGN: Retrospective case survey, based on patient hospital records.
SETTING: Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria (a tertiary teaching hospital), in 1991 and 1992.
SUBJECTS: All patients admitted with lower-limb cellulitis as the primary diagnosis.
RESULTS: 118 patients were included. Underlying disease predisposing to cellulitis was found in 79%, but was adequately investigated in only 20% of these. Blood cultures were performed in 55%, all with negative results. Other microbiological investigations also had poor yields. Combination therapy with intravenous (i.v.) flucloxacillin and penicillin was given to 76%, with duration varying widely (mean, six days). Where documented (73%), most patients (94%) responded to antibiotics within five days. However, in 40% of patients i.v. therapy was continued for longer and in 10% for 10 days or more, with no significant difference in outcome. Length of hospital stay averaged 13 days, with prolonged stay often associated with surgical intervention or intercurrent problems. However, 15% of patients remained in hospital longer than 10 days for no clear indication. Outpatient review was common (75%), but persistence or relapse of cellulitis was found in only four patients on review.
CONCLUSIONS: Management of inpatients with cellulitis is inefficient, with excessive use of microbiological investigations, inadequate investigation and treatment of underlying disease, prolonged use of intravenous antibiotics, unnecessarily long hospital stays, questionable use of combination antibiotic therapy and excessive outpatient review (rather than review by a local medical practitioner).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8941241     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb138641.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  7 in total

1.  Lesson of the week: importance of distinguishing between cellulitis and varicose eczema of the leg.

Authors:  C M Quartey-Papafio
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-19

2.  Flucloxacillin alone or combined with benzylpenicillin to treat lower limb cellulitis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Leman; D Mukherjee
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Factors associated with complications and mortality in adult patients hospitalized for infectious cellulitis.

Authors:  J Carratalà; B Rosón; N Fernández-Sabé; E Shaw; O del Rio; A Rivera; F Gudiol
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Cellulitis and erysipelas.

Authors:  Andrew D Morris
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-01-02

5.  Cellulitis incidence in a defined population.

Authors:  S M Ellis Simonsen; E R van Orman; B E Hatch; S S Jones; L H Gren; K T Hegmann; J L Lyon
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Cellulitis and erysipelas: prevention.

Authors:  Choon Chiat Oh
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-11-18

7.  Use of cultures in cellulitis: when, how, and why?

Authors:  L J Eron; B A Lipsky
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.103

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.