Literature DB >> 8941183

Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.

V Shetty1, E Freymiller, D McBrearty, A A Caputo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study determined the relative functional stabilities of various miniplate systems and configurations used to stabilize sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) and compared them with conventional internal screw fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biomechanical model was a reproducible prototype of a mandible sagittal osteotomy with consistent material and geometric properties. After advancing the distal segment by 7 mm, each set of mandible analogs (1 set = 3 analogs) was fixed bilaterally by one of three miniplate systems applied in various configurations, and tested with and without a supplemental 2.4-mm bicortical screw applied in the retromolar region. Reduced analogs were placed in a straining frame, and simulated masticatory loads were applied alternatively to the mandibular first molars. Ensuing osteotomy site displacements were measured by transducers attached to a computer-based data acquisition program. A coordinate transformation procedure was used to convert the component displacements captured by the individual transducers into a common "instability factor" to reflect fixation stability for each construct and loading condition. Instability factors for the individual constructs were compared with each other and with those obtained from analogs reduced exclusively with 2.4-mm position screws.
RESULTS: Osteotomies stabilized with a combination of miniplates and position screws were more stable than those stabilized exclusively with miniplates (P < .0001). Post-hoc comparisons of mean instability factors (Dunnet's method) showed the miniplate-position screw combinations to be more stable than the 2.4-mm position screw system used as standard (P < .05). Miniplate systems alone were the least stable of the test constructs, with differential rates of failure between the individual miniplate systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Exclusive use of miniplate fixation may not provide the consistent stability necessary for early functional restoration after SSROs. The addition of a position screw in the retromolar region substantially enhances the fixation stability of miniplate systems. The use of miniplates with retromolar position screws offers both technical and stability advantages over conventional miniplate or internal screw fixation. The fixation stability of the miniplate-position screw combination is independent of the type of miniplate system used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8941183     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90490-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  7 in total

1.  Mechanical and photoelastic analysis of conventional screws and cannulated screws for sagittal split osteotomy fixation: a comparative study.

Authors:  Cristina Jardelino de Lima; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci; Danillo Costa Rodrigues; Érica Cristina Marchiori; Roger Willian Fernandes Moreira
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-06

2.  Hybrid fixation in the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for lower jaw advancement.

Authors:  Felipe Ladeira Pereira; Marcos Janson; Eduardo Sant'Ana
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Investigation of a Modified Novel Technique in Bilateral Sagittal Splitting Osteotomy Fixation: Finite Element Analysis and In Vitro Biomechanical Test.

Authors:  Li-Ren Chang; Chien-Chung Chen; Seng Feng Jeng; Yu-Ray Chen; Lain-Chyr Hwang; Ting-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

Review 5.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Biomechanical in vitro evaluation of three stable internal fixation techniques used in sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a study in sheep mandibles.

Authors:  Leandro Benetti de Olivera; Eduardo Sant' Ana; Antonio José Manzato; Fábio Luis Bunemer Guerra; G William Arnett
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation for Yaw Control of the Mandibular Condyle and Its Actual Application to Orthognathic Surgery: A One-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Ju-Won Kim; Jong-Cheol Kim; Kyeong-Jun Cheon; Seoung-Won Cho; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.