Activin inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth: selective actions on androgen-responsive LNCaP cells.

Prostate epithelial cell growth is under the control of both steroid and peptide factors. Human prostate cancer cell lines have been used to investigate similar agents in malignancy. Activins are dimeric peptides structurally related to transforming growth factor-beta and produced in the gonads and a wide array of extragonadal tissues. The activins act at the pituitary to regulate the synthesis and secretion of FSH. At other sites, such as bone marrow, liver, and gonads, activin may play an important role in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation. It was the purpose of the current study to determine whether activin had similar actions on prostate cancer cells, specifically the androgen-responsive LNCaP and the androgen-resistant PC-3 cell lines. Using reverse transcription-PCR, messenger RNAs for type I and type II activin receptor subunits as well as the activin-binding protein follistatin were detected in both cell lines. Activin treatment rapidly (<24 h) inhibited LNCaP, but not PC-3, cell growth. The effects of activin were evident at low levels, with a concentration of 5 ng/ml being effective at 24 h, and a concentration of 0.5 ng/ml being effective at 48 h. These results contrasted with the actions of transforming growth factor-beta, which inhibited only PC-3 cells and required a greater treatment duration (96 h) to be effective. To determine whether these prostate cancer cell lines were also producing activin, LNCaP and PC-3 cells were treated with follistatin. Again, only the LNCaP cells responded, with growth acceleration noted by 24 h. As PC-3 cell responses to activin could be independent of cell proliferation, we transfected LNCaP and PC-3 cells with a known activin-responsive promoter/reporter gene construct (p3TP-Lux) and treated cells with activin. Only LNCaP cells produced a measurable response in luciferase activity. Finally, we attempted to determine whether the PC-3 cell resistance to activin was mediated via a transferable factor. PC-3 conditioned medium was added to LNCaP cells in the absence or presence of exogenous activin and had a small, but statistically nonsignificant (P < 0.09), action to blunt the actions of activin. We conclude that activin is a potent growth inhibitor of LNCaP cell growth. Moreover, these cells also produce activin, suggesting that locally derived activin may play a role in regulating cell proliferation. Despite expressing messenger RNAs for activin receptors, PC-3 cells are resistant to activin, perhaps the result of the production of an activin-blocking factor or a defective activin response system. These cell lines will thus serve as useful models in which to further study the cellular basis of activin action.