Literature DB >> 8938493

A model to assess the usefulness of performance indicators.

R S Turpin1, L A Darcy, R Koss, C McMahill, K Meyne, D Morton, J Rodriguez, S Schmaltz, P Schyve, P Smith.   

Abstract

This paper describes the Perception-Action-Impact (PAI) model used for testing the usefulness of health care organization performance indicators, and reports preliminary data in support of this model. Two hundred and ninety six hospitals contributed 500,000 obstetrical cases, and responded to surveys to assess various aspects of indicator usefulness. Domains of interest that were assessed include relevance of the measures, whether the measures identified opportunities for improvement, whether the health care organization took any action in response to the data, health care organizational structure for data use, and methods for dissemination of the indicator data. Findings from this study provide support for the PAI model. Consequently, perceptions regarding the indicators apparently have a significant impact on the usefulness of the data. When action was taken in response to the indicator data, a positive impact on patient care processes and outcomes was the typical result. Additional research is needed in the areas of data dissemination effectiveness, and the impact of attitude change on the use of performance measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8938493     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/8.4.321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  8 in total

1.  Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data.

Authors:  Liane Soberman Ginsburg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Competing values of emergency department performance: balancing multiple stakeholder perspectives.

Authors:  Deborah Tregunno; G Ross Baker; Jan Barnsley; Michael Murray
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Performance measurement in healthcare: part I--concepts and trends from a State of the Science Review.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Elizabeth Simpson; Ann L Casebeer; Judith M Birdsell; Katharine A Hayden; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-05

4.  Performance measurement in healthcare: part II--state of the science findings by stage of the performance measurement process.

Authors:  Carol E Adair; Elizabeth Simpson; Ann L Casebeer; Judith M Birdsell; Katharine A Hayden; Steven Lewis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-07

5.  Quality indicators for primary care mental health services.

Authors:  T Shield; S Campbell; A Rogers; A Worrall; C Chew-Graham; L Gask
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2003-04

6.  Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  E K Wilkinson; A McColl; M Exworthy; P Roderick; H Smith; M Moore; J Gabbay
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

7.  Identifying physician-recognized depression from administrative data: consequences for quality measurement.

Authors:  Claire M Spettell; Terry C Wall; Jeroan Allison; Jaimee Calhoun; Richard Kobylinski; Rachel Fargason; Catarina I Kiefe
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Patient safety culture in hospitals of Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saber Azami-Aghdash; Farbod Ebadifard Azar; Aziz Rezapour; Akbar Azami; Vahid Rasi; Khalil Klvany
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2015-08-23
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.