OBJECTIVE: to ascertain: (i) which demographic, obstetric, maternity care, practical and attitudinal variables, and which variables relating to social support and life problems predict satisfaction with traditional antenatal visit schedules; and (ii) which of these variables predict satisfaction with reduced antenatal visit schedules. DESIGN: a secondary analysis of data from the Antenatal Care Project (a randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of routine antenatal visits). SETTING:three hospitals and their community sites in south-east London. PARTICIPANTS: 1882 pregnant women, that is all those who took part in the Antenatal Care Project, on whom maternity record data were available, and who returned their antenatal questionnaire. INTERVENTION: participants were randomly allocated to follow either the traditional schedule of 13 routine antenatal visits, or a reduced schedule of seven visits for nulliparous women and six visits for multiparous women. MEASUREMENTS: a questionnaire developed specifically for the Antenatal Care Project. Also some data extracted from women's maternity records. FINDINGS: women satisfied with reduced schedules were more likely to live in rented accommodation, and to have a caregiver who both listened and encourage them to ask questions than women not satisfied with reduced schedules. Women satisfied with the reduced schedules were less likely to be depressed in pregnancy than those not satisfied with reduced schedules. Women satisfied with the traditional schedule were more likely to have their general practitioner involved in their antenatal care, and to receive social support from relatives than those not satisfied with the traditional schedule. Initial preferences and expectations were also associated with satisfaction. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: (i) groups most likely to be satisfied with traditional or reduced antenatal visit schedules cannot be easily identified. It is therefore necessary to talk to women individually, and tailor care to their particular preferences; (ii) social support for depressed women needs to be safeguarded if reduced schedules are to be introduced; (iii) improving the psychosocial quality of antenatal care may be a good strategy for making reduced visit schedules more acceptable to pregnant women.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: to ascertain: (i) which demographic, obstetric, maternity care, practical and attitudinal variables, and which variables relating to social support and life problems predict satisfaction with traditional antenatal visit schedules; and (ii) which of these variables predict satisfaction with reduced antenatal visit schedules. DESIGN: a secondary analysis of data from the Antenatal Care Project (a randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of routine antenatal visits). SETTING: three hospitals and their community sites in south-east London. PARTICIPANTS: 1882 pregnant women, that is all those who took part in the Antenatal Care Project, on whom maternity record data were available, and who returned their antenatal questionnaire. INTERVENTION: participants were randomly allocated to follow either the traditional schedule of 13 routine antenatal visits, or a reduced schedule of seven visits for nulliparous women and six visits for multiparous women. MEASUREMENTS: a questionnaire developed specifically for the Antenatal Care Project. Also some data extracted from women's maternity records. FINDINGS:women satisfied with reduced schedules were more likely to live in rented accommodation, and to have a caregiver who both listened and encourage them to ask questions than women not satisfied with reduced schedules. Women satisfied with the reduced schedules were less likely to be depressed in pregnancy than those not satisfied with reduced schedules. Women satisfied with the traditional schedule were more likely to have their general practitioner involved in their antenatal care, and to receive social support from relatives than those not satisfied with the traditional schedule. Initial preferences and expectations were also associated with satisfaction. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: (i) groups most likely to be satisfied with traditional or reduced antenatal visit schedules cannot be easily identified. It is therefore necessary to talk to women individually, and tailor care to their particular preferences; (ii) social support for depressedwomen needs to be safeguarded if reduced schedules are to be introduced; (iii) improving the psychosocial quality of antenatal care may be a good strategy for making reduced visit schedules more acceptable to pregnant women.
Authors: Marzhan A Dauletyarova; Yuliya M Semenova; Galiya Kaylubaeva; Gulshat K Manabaeva; Bakytkul Toktabayeva; Maryash S Zhelpakova; Oxana A Yurkovskaya; Aidos S Tlemissov; Galina Antonova; Andrej M Grjibovski Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-06-03 Impact factor: 3.007