Literature DB >> 8937766

The right not to know--worthy of preservation any longer? An ethical perspective.

T Austad1.   

Abstract

A presumed right not to know has been claimed in several discussions about testing for genetic diseases or genetic risks in families of populations. In this paper, ethical problems arising from the implementation of a possible right not to know are examined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8937766     DOI： 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1996.tb02353.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN： 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  4 in total

1.  Respecting autonomous decision making among Filipinos: a re-emphasis in genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jonathan Diego Cura
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Scrutinizing the Right Not to Know.

Authors:  Benjamin E Berkman; Sara Chandros Hull; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know--that is not the question.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  The right not to know and the obligation to know.

Authors:  Ben Davies
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.926
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.