Literature DB >> 8937661

Musculoskeletal injuries in track and field: incidence, distribution and risk factors.

K L Bennell1, K Crossley.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the incidence, distribution and types of musculoskeletal injuries sustained by 95 track and field athletes in a 12 month period using a retrospective cohort design, and analysed selected training, anthropometric, menstrual and clinical biomechanical risk factors. Overall, 72 athletes sustained 130 injuries giving an athlete incidence rate of 76% and an injury exposure rate of 3.9 per 1000 training hours. The majority of injuries were overuse in nature and approximately one-third of all injuries were recurrent. The risk of injury was not influenced by gender or event group. The most common sites of injury were the leg (28%), thigh (22%) and knee (16%) with the most common diagnoses being stress fractures (21%) and hamstring strains (14%). Injury patterns varied between event groups with middle-distance and distance runners sustaining more overuse injuries, and sprinters, hurdlers, jumpers and multi event athletes more acute injuries (p < 0.05). Increasing age, greater overall flexibility and a greater prevalence of menstrual disturbances were associated with a greater likelihood of injury. The results of this study show that track and field athletes are at high risk for musculoskeletal injury and that it may be possible to identify those who are more likely to sustain an injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8937661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Sci Med Sport        ISSN: 0813-6289


  46 in total

1.  Relation of anterior pelvic tilt during running to clinical and kinematic measures of hip extension.

Authors:  A G Schache; P D Blanch; A T Murphy
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Hamstring strain injuries: factors that lead to injury and re-injury.

Authors:  David A Opar; Morgan D Williams; Anthony J Shield
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Hip- and knee-strength assessments using a hand-held dynamometer with external belt-fixation are inter-tester reliable.

Authors:  Kristian Thorborg; Thomas Bandholm; Per Hölmich
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Bone strength index in adolescent girls: does physical activity make a difference?

Authors:  D A Greene; G A Naughton; J N Briody; A Kemp; H Woodhead; L Corrigan
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  Surgical treatment of partial tears of the proximal origin of the hamstring muscles.

Authors:  L Lempainen; J Sarimo; J Heikkilä; K Mattila; S Orava
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Conceptual framework for strengthening exercises to prevent hamstring strains.

Authors:  Kenny Guex; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Self-reported versus diagnosed stress fractures in norwegian female elite athletes.

Authors:  Jannike Oyen; Monica Klungland Torstveit; Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

8.  Differences in the electromyographic activity of the hamstring muscles during maximal eccentric knee flexion.

Authors:  Ayako Higashihara; Takashi Ono; Jun Kubota; Toru Fukubayashi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  The oral contraceptive pill: a revolution for sportswomen?

Authors:  K Bennell; S White; K Crossley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 13.800

10.  Analysis of Injury Rates and Treatment Patterns for Time-Loss and Non-Time-Loss Injuries Among Collegiate Student-Athletes.

Authors:  John W. Powell; Thomas P. Dompier
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.