Literature DB >> 8937059

Perioperative myocardial infarction in coronary artery disease patients and 'at-risk' for coronary artery disease patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

M K Varma1, G D Puri, P Chari, J S Verma, K K Kohli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial infarction (POMI) carries a high mortality and occurs more commonly in patients with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, there are also other patients undergoing surgery who are 'at risk' for CAD but who do not have a history of infarction or angina. We compared the incidence of POMI in these two groups.
METHODS: In a prospective study of 69 men and 39 women over 30 years of age undergoing non-cardiac surgery under general or regional anaesthesia, 56 had definite CAD and 52 were 'at-risk' for CAD. All these patients were followed up with serial postoperative electrocardiography and CK-MB isoenzyme analysis for the diagnosis of POMI.
RESULTS: The POMI rate was 32% in definite CAD patients and 15% in patients 'at-risk' for CAD. Mortality in patients with POMI was 17% in those with CAD and 13% in those 'at-risk' for CAD. Perioperative myocardial infarction was maximal in the first 24 hours following surgery (77%). All the POMIs were painless. Anaesthesia techniques--whether regional or general--did not influence the incidence of POMI (Chi-square, p > 0.05). The type of drugs used in the treatment of CAD such as beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers and antiplatelet agents did not cause any difference in the incidence of POMI (Chi-square, p > 0.05). Patients who had either an intraoperative hypertensive episode, tachycardia, arrhythmias or ST-segment changes had a higher incidence of POMI (Chi-square, p > 0.05). The incidence of POMI was not lower in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate compared to patients undergoing other types of non-cardiac surgery (Chi-square, p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: POMI occurs in one-third of patients with a history of CAD and one-sixth of those 'at-risk'. It carries a mortality of 17% and 13% respectively. Decisions to operate on such patients should be taken with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8937059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Natl Med J India        ISSN: 0970-258X            Impact factor:   0.537


  1 in total

1.  Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhong-Liang Dai; Xing-Tao Cai; Wen-Li Gao; Miao Lin; Juan Lin; Yuan-Xu Jiang; Xin Jiang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.