Literature DB >> 8936395

Preparation for action: an ERP study about two tasks provoking variability in response speed.

E Wascher1, R Verleger, P Jaskowski, B Wauschkuhn.   

Abstract

This study focused on the covariation of response speed and event-related potentials during response preparation and on whether these variations can be brought under experimental control. Two S1-S2 choice response tasks with temporal uncertainty were conducted. In Experiment 1, S1 was 100% informative. Fast subjects showed larger P3s with S1 than slow subjects. The terminal CNV (tCNV) increased intraindividually with response speed. In Experiment 2, 50% of S1s were uninformative and the visual display was designed to attract more attention. Effects of information were found on P3 amplitude, on the topography of tCNV, and on the temporal distribution of response times. Interindividual differences disappeared in Experiment 2. The results suggest that group differences in Experiment 1 were due to different strategies of allocating visual attention. Interindividual variations of strategy showed a pattern of effects different from intraindividual variations of efficiency.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8936395     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  The relation of aerobic fitness to neuroelectric indices of cognitive and motor task preparation.

Authors:  Keita Kamijo; Kevin C O'Leary; Matthew B Pontifex; Jason R Themanson; Charles H Hillman
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Preparatory attention after lesions to the lateral or orbital prefrontal cortex--an event-related potentials study.

Authors:  Ingrid Funderud; Marianne Løvstad; Magnus Lindgren; Tor Endestad; Paulina Due-Tønnessen; Torstein R Meling; Robert T Knight; Anne-Kristin Solbakk
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Task preparation processes related to reward prediction precede those related to task-difficulty expectation.

Authors:  Hanne Schevernels; Ruth M Krebs; Patrick Santens; Marty G Woldorff; C Nicolas Boehler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Differential effects of prolonged work on performance measures in self-paced speed tests.

Authors:  Michael B Steinborn; Hagen C Flehmig; Karl Westhoff; Robert Langner
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-03-03

5.  Cerebral correlates of faking: evidence from a brief implicit association test on doping attitudes.

Authors:  Sebastian Schindler; Wanja Wolff; Johanna M Kissler; Ralf Brand
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation.

Authors:  R Frömer; H Lin; C K Dean Wolf; M Inzlicht; A Shenhav
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Annual research review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype.

Authors:  Sarah L Karalunas; Hilde M Geurts; Kerstin Konrad; Stephan Bender; Joel T Nigg
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.982

8.  Uninstructed BIAT faking when ego depleted or in normal state: differential effect on brain and behavior.

Authors:  Wanja Wolff; Sebastian Schindler; Christoph Englert; Ralf Brand; Johanna Kissler
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 3.288

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.