Literature DB >> 8935905

Structure from motion: a tolerance analysis.

M A Hogervorst1, A M Kappers, J J Koenderink.   

Abstract

We present a tolerance analysis that is applicable to a large group of stimuli used in structure-from-motion tasks. Human performance in structure-from-motion tasks reflects the fact that the visual system deals with projections of a 3-D world on the retina. A tolerance analysis reveals the relationship between the projections and the 3-D world. Any realistic model of the visual system should incorporate a tolerance analysis as a complete description of the stimulus. By way of example we apply the tolerance analysis to the stimuli used in two widely known experiments in which different properties of structure were tested--that is, perceived nonrigidity (Norman & Todd, 1993) and ordering in depth (Hildreth, Grzywacz, Adelson, & Inada, 1990). The analysis explains qualitatively the results of these experiments, illustrating that the results are to a large extent due to stimulus limitations rather than to mechanistic properties of the visual system. From our analysis it follows that far more sensitive measurements of the optic information are needed to obtain metric structure than affine structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935905     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  13 in total

1.  The kinetic depth effect.

Authors:  H WALLACH; D N O'CONNELL
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1953-04

2.  The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences.

Authors:  J T Todd; P Bressan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-11

3.  The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences.

Authors:  J T Todd; J F Norman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-12

4.  The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  E C Hildreth; N M Grzywacz; E H Adelson; V K Inada
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-07

5.  Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion.

Authors:  B M Bennett; D D Hoffman; J E Nicola; C Prakash
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Perception of structure from motion: is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition?

Authors:  J T Todd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Facts on optic flow.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations.

Authors:  J F Norman; J T Todd
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

9.  Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and nonrigid motion.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Human perception of structure from motion.

Authors:  S Treue; M Husain; R A Andersen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields.

Authors:  V J Perotti; J T Todd; J F Norman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-07

2.  Discerning nonrigid 3D shapes from motion cues.

Authors:  Anshul Jain; Qasim Zaidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.