Literature DB >> 8934032

Prenatal diagnosis using fetal cells isolated from maternal peripheral blood: a review.

C D Steele1, R J Wapner, J B Smith, M K Haynes, L G Jackson.   

Abstract

Many questions remain about the feasibility of using fetal cells from maternal blood for prenatal diagnosis. Although recently there has been more focus on clinically relevant methods, many studies have been performed using blood drawn after invasive procedures, and over a wide range of gestational ages. For methods to be applicable to clinical use, more work is needed on isolating cells early in pregnancy, when termination is still an option for parents who are found to have an affected pregnancy. It is generally agreed that fetal nucleated erythrocytes are the most efficacious cell type for prenatal diagnosis, but it has not yet been shown definitively whether there is an ideal gestational age for sampling, whether ABO incompatibility might limit availability of fetal cells, or whether the number of cells present might be different in normal versus abnormal pregnancies. PCR has been shown to be a powerful tool in allowing amplification and identification of very small amounts of fetal DNA. However, this is limited to cases in which a specific and unique gene from the father is sought. This means that there is the potential to diagnose many paternally inherited autosomal dominant diseases and some autosomal recessive diseases, in which the parents have different and identifiable mutations. However, when parents are both carriers of the same autosomal recessive mutations, or when the disease is X linked, PCR will not aid in prenatal diagnosis. Cytogenetic analysis of fetal cells by FISH after cell sorting is another potentially useful method of prenatal diagnosis, but requires relatively pure samples of fetal cells or an independent marker that allows easy microscopic identification. The latter might be accomplished by identifying fetal cells through their expression of embryonic hemoglobins or because they contain HLA-G mRNA. In addition, current techniques of cell sorting must be improved so that a higher percentage of fetal cells can be isolated. Currently, the best cell sorting techniques usually produce a maximum purity of 10% fetal cells. Commonly, in normal pregnancies, fewer than 0.1% of the cells isolated after sorting are fetal in origin. Improving the concentration and quantity of fetal cells will improve the accuracy of FISH. Methods such as immunophenotyping that allow the selective identification of fetal cells by microscopy, and can be used in conjunction with FISH, may be extremely valuable because they may allow the genetic analysis of only the few fetal cells within a background preponderance of maternal cells. Although the retrieval of fetal cells from maternal blood is an attractive concept, it must be clearly stated that presently it is only in the investigational phase because of the low sensitivity and specificity. There is no current application for these methods in clinical practice. It remains to be determined whether testing maternal blood for fetal cells or DNA will be used as a screening tool, similar to the maternal serum screening currently in use, or whether the accuracy can be improved to a level such that the techniques can be used diagnostically. Although there are many questions that remain unanswered at this time, the outlook for noninvasive prenatal genetic testing in the future is optimistic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934032     DOI: 10.1097/00003081-199612000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  11 in total

1.  Selective nucleic acid removal via exclusion (SNARE): capturing mRNA and DNA from a single sample.

Authors:  Lindsay Strotman; Rachel O'Connell; Benjamin P Casavant; Scott M Berry; Jamie M Sperger; Joshua M Lang; David J Beebe
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  High-efficiency rare cell identification on a high-density self-assembled cell arrangement chip.

Authors:  Tsung-Ju Chen; Jen-Kuei Wu; Yu-Cheng Chang; Chien-Yu Fu; Tsung-Pao Wang; Chun-Yen Lin; Hwan-You Chang; Ching-Chang Chieng; Chung-Yuh Tzeng; Fan-Gang Tseng
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 3.  Transcervical retrieval of fetal cells in the practice of modern medicine: a review of the current literature and future direction.

Authors:  Anthony N Imudia; Sanjeev Kumar; Michael P Diamond; Alan H DeCherney; D Randall Armant
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Lack of evidence for involvement of fetal microchimerism in pathogenesis of primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  Maximilian Schöniger-Hekele; Christian Müller; Jutta Ackermann; Johannes Drach; Friedrich Wrba; Edward Penner; Peter Ferenci
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Y specific sequence gene analysis of single fetal nucleated erythroblasts from the peripheral blood of pregnant women.

Authors:  T Wang; H Chen; Y Lu; T Ma
Journal:  J Tongji Med Univ       Date:  2001

Review 6.  Invasive & non-invasive approaches for prenatal diagnosis of haemoglobinopathies: experiences from India.

Authors:  R B Colah; A C Gorakshakar; A H Nadkarni
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Replicative homeostasis II: influence of polymerase fidelity on RNA virus quasispecies biology: implications for immune recognition, viral autoimmunity and other "virus receptor" diseases.

Authors:  Richard Sallie
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Prediction, prevention and personalisation of medication for the prenatal period: genetic prenatal tests for both rare and common diseases.

Authors:  Munis Dundar; Asli Subasioglu Uzak; Murat Erdogan; Yagut Akbarova
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.543

9.  Microchimerism in graves' disease.

Authors:  Juan C Galofré
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2012-04-05

Review 10.  Fetal microchimeric cells in autoimmune thyroid diseases: harmful, beneficial or innocent for the thyroid gland?

Authors:  Trees Lepez; Mado Vandewoestyne; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  Chimerism       Date:  2013-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.