Literature DB >> 8933436

Smear layer instability caused by hemostatic agents.

M F Land1, C C Couri, W M Johnston.   

Abstract

The effect of hemostatic agents, other than a 15.5% Fe2(SO4)3 solution, on prepared tooth structure is unknown. The purpose of this study was to (1) compare the effect of six commonly used hemostatic solutions and two nondental astringents on the dentinal smear layer and (2) determine whether different responses caused by product and/or time could be established. Standardized dentinal smear layers were exposed to eight astringent solutions for 30, 120, and 300 seconds (n = 6). A total of 144 SEM photographs at x2400 magnification were ranked according to predetermined criteria for five categories of smear layer removal and etching of underlying tooth structure. There were significant differences (p < 0.001) caused by the solution, exposure time, and their interaction. Greatest smear layer removal was observed with 21.3% AlCl3-6 hydrate, 8% racemic epinephrine HCl, and 15.5% Fe2(SO4)3 solutions at longer exposures. These caused significantly more removal than did almost pH neutral tetrahydrozoline or oxymetazoline (p < 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8933436     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90004-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  7 in total

1.  The Influence of Hemostatic Agents and Cordless Gingival Retraction Materials on Smear Layer: An Ex vivo Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis.

Authors:  Shailendra Kuamar Sahu; Suhasini J Nagda
Journal:  Int J Appl Basic Med Res       Date:  2021-07-19

2.  Comparative evaluation of the amount of gingival displacement produced by three different gingival retraction systems: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Jignesh Chaudhari; Paranjay Prajapati; Jayanti Patel; Rajesh Sethuraman; Y G Naveen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

3.  Effect of Contamination with Hemostatic Agent on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentin Using G-Premio and Single Bond Universal Adhesives.

Authors:  Zahra Khamverdi; Naemeh Karimian; Maryam Farhadian; Hamed Gheitouli
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-07-25

4.  Effect of ferric sulfate contamination on the bonding effectiveness of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives to superficial dentin.

Authors:  Shahram Farzin Ebrahimi; Niloofar Shadman; Arezoo Abrishami
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-03

5.  Do blood contamination and haemostatic agents affect microtensile bond strength of dual cured resin cement to dentin?

Authors:  Kerem Kilic; Soley Arslan; Goknil Alkan Demetoglu; Gokmen Zararsiz; Bulent Kesim
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 6.  A review on common chemical hemostatic agents in restorative dentistry.

Authors:  Pardis Tarighi; Maryam Khoroushi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-07

7.  Effect of various chemical agents used in gingival retraction systems on smear layer: Scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  Krishna Shivraj Lahoti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.