Literature DB >> 8933031

Identification of needs in biomarker research.

J B Ward1, R E Henderson.   

Abstract

Interest in the use of biological markers to evaluate future disease risk has increased greatly in recent years. Biomarkers are observable end points in a continuum of events leading from exposure to toxic agents to diseases that ultimately result from exposure. Because many significant diseases develop over long periods of time, methods for detecting early events that can predict risk are important for disease prevention. Biomarkers are generally categorized as detecting exposure, effects of exposure, or individual susceptibility to exposure. Although there has been significant progress in the technical development of biomarkers, implementation of their use in human populations has progressed much more slowly. We discuss four major needs in the development of biomarkers. First, new biomarkers need to be developed to fill gaps in our ability to observe steps in the continuum from exposure to disease. Second, the relationships between biomarker responses and disease pathology needs to be better understood. Third, the sensitivity, specificity, and variability of biomarkers need to be better characterized and they must be better validated as predictors of disease risk. Fourth, there are several societal impediments to the practical implementation of biomarker studies as public health tools. A common agreement among employers, employees, regulators, and the legal community must be established regarding appropriate and ethical uses and interpretation of biomarker data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8933031      PMCID: PMC1469706          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.96104s5895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  19 in total

Review 1.  The use of biological markers in toxicology.

Authors:  R F Henderson; W E Bechtold; J A Bond; J D Sun
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  The effects of some redox-active metals and reactive aldehydes on DNA-protein cross-links in vitro.

Authors:  K L Olin; G N Cherr; E Rifkin; C L Keen
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1996-06-17       Impact factor: 4.221

3.  Leukemia following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  J M Kaldor; N E Day; F Pettersson; E A Clarke; D Pedersen; W Mehnert; J Bell; H Høst; P Prior; S Karjalainen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Longitudinal study of the in vivo hprt mutant frequency in human T-lymphocytes as determined by a cell cloning assay.

Authors:  J P O'Neill; L M Sullivan; J K Booker; B S Pornelos; M T Falta; C J Greene; R J Albertini
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Elevated frequencies of 6-thioguanine-resistant lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis patients treated with cyclophosphamide: a prospective study.

Authors:  M M Ammenheuser; J B Ward; E B Whorton; J M Killian; M S Legator
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 6.  Neurochemical approaches to developing biochemical markers of neurotoxicity: review of current status and evaluation of future prospects.

Authors:  E K Silbergeld
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Measurements of the frequency of human erythrocytes with gene expression loss phenotypes at the glycophorin A locus.

Authors:  R G Langlois; W L Bigbee; R H Jensen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Development and field-test validation of an assay for DNA repair in circulating human lymphocytes.

Authors:  W F Athas; M A Hedayati; G M Matanoski; E R Farmer; L Grossman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 9.  I-compounds--endogenous DNA markers of nutritional status, ageing, tumour promotion and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  K Randerath; D Li; B Moorthy; E Randerath
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  1993

10.  Somatic gene mutations in vivo as indicated by the 6-thioguanine-resistant T-lymphocytes in human blood.

Authors:  R J Albertini
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genotoxic risk of quinocetone and its possible mechanism in in vitro studies.

Authors:  Xu Wang; Panpan Yang; Juan Li; Awais Ihsan; Qianying Liu; Guyue Cheng; Yanfei Tao; Zhengli Liu; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  DNA methylation modifies urine biomarker levels in 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate exposed workers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Leena A Nylander-French; Michael C Wu; John E French; Jayne C Boyer; Lisa Smeester; Alison P Sanders; Rebecca C Fry
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.372

3.  Validation of reverse phase protein array for practical screening of potential biomarkers in serum and plasma: accurate detection of CA19-9 levels in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tobias Grote; Doris R Siwak; Herbert A Fritsche; Corwin Joy; Gordon B Mills; Diane Simeone; David C Whitcomb; Craig D Logsdon
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.984

4.  Mitochondrial membrane potential: a novel biomarker of oxidative environmental stress.

Authors:  Muriel Vayssier-Taussat; Sarah E Kreps; Christophe Adrie; Josette Dall'Ava; David Christiani; Barbara S Polla
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.