Literature DB >> 8932808

Fungal infections in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation: an approach to a rational management protocol.

E Castagnola1, B Bucci, E Montinaro, C Viscoli.   

Abstract

Candida sp. and Aspergillus sp. are the most common fungal pathogens causing infection in bone marrow transplant recipients and represent an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality. At this time there is no generally accepted rule for the antifungal management of these complications. Antifungal drugs in immunocompromised patients are usually administered for prophylaxis, for therapy of specific infections or for empirical or preemptive therapy. The present article reports schedules of administrations and pediatric and adult dosages of the main antifungal drugs presently available, (fluconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B deoxycholate, lipid formulations of amphotericin B and flucytosine), together with their spectrum of action and main toxicities. Thereafter, the available information about prevention and treatment of fungal infections in bone marrow transplant recipients is summarized. Briefly, fluconazole remains the drug of choice for prevention of Candida infections in bone marrow transplant recipients, while itraconazole has been seldomly used for this indication, due to erratic oral absorption. However, new itraconazole formulations are being studied, that might disclose new clinical perspectives, due to improved bioavailability. The duration of prophylaxis is still an open issue. Resistance to the new azoles may become a problem in the near future. For this reason, it is likely that the approach to the use of these new drugs should be similar to the one commonly used for antibacterial drugs, i.e. based on pathogen-related, drug-related and host-related factors. Mainly due to lack of diagnostic tools, very little studies have been performed for prevention of aspergillosis. Available data seem to show that there might be a role for low-dose intravenous amphotericin B, which has shown to be effective for secondary prophylaxis. Itraconazole and intranasal amphotericin B have been studied, as well. Although fluconazole and itraconazole (in the rare instances in which the oral route is reliable) can also have therapeutic indications, both for empirical and for specific therapy, amphotericin B (with or without flucytosine) remains the main therapeutic option. New antifungal drugs and new supportive strategies (i.e. role of hematopoietic growth factors) are in the research pipeline and will hopefully disclose new perspectives in the near future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8932808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  4 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of itraconazole oral solution in neutropenic children during long-term prophylaxis.

Authors:  C Schmitt; Y Perel; J L Harousseau; S Lemerle; E Chwetzoff; J P le Moing; J C Levron
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Epidemiology of visceral mycoses: analysis of data in annual of the pathological autopsy cases in Japan.

Authors:  T Yamazaki; H Kume; S Murase; E Yamashita; M Arisawa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Fatal disseminated Trichoderma longibrachiatum infection in an adult bone marrow transplant patient: species identification and review of the literature.

Authors:  S Richter; M G Cormican; M A Pfaller; C K Lee; R Gingrich; M G Rinaldi; D A Sutton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Current and emerging azole antifungal agents.

Authors:  D J Sheehan; C A Hitchcock; C M Sibley
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.