Literature DB >> 8931612

Effectiveness of health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among eastern-band Cherokee Indian women in North Carolina.

M Dignan1, R Michielutte, K Blinson, H B Wells, L D Case, P Sharp, S Davis, J Konen, R P McQuellon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The North Carolina Native American Cervical Cancer Prevention Project was a 5-year, National Cancer Institute-funded trial of health education designed to increase screening for cervical cancer among Native-American women in North Carolina.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this education program in the Eastern-Band Cherokee target population.
METHODS: Cherokee tribal lands were mapped and all households (N = 2223) were listed to ensure maximum coverage of the eligible population (women, aged 18 years and older, who were enrolled tribal members). Eligible women were identified by the use of a brief questionnaire administered to an adult member of the household. Of the 1279 households with eligible women, 1020 (79.8%) agreed to participate. The intervention was an individualized health education program delivered by female Cherokee lay health educators. The participants were randomly assigned to receive or not to receive the intervention (i.e., to program and control groups, respectively) by use of the Solomon Four-Group design. Data were collected in face-to-face interviews conducted in the participant's home. Of the 996 women who were ultimately enrolled, 540 were randomly assigned to receive a pretest (preintervention) interview that involved administration of a 96-item questionnaire designed to collect data on knowledge, intentions, and behaviors related to cervical cancer; of these 540 women, 263 were randomly assigned to receive the education program. The remaining 456 women did not receive the pretest, but 218 were randomly assigned to receive the education program. Six months after receiving the education program, the women in all four groups were administered a post-test that was identical to the pretest. Logistic regression was used to assess the effects of the pretest and the educational program. All P values resulted from two-sided statistical tests.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and fifteen (81.8%) of the 996 participants completed the post-test interview. The remaining 181 women who were lost to follow-up were evenly distributed among the four study groups. At the post-test, 282 (73.2%) of the 385 women who received the education program reported having had a Pap smear following the intervention, compared with 275 (64%) of the 430 control subjects. Women who received the education program were more likely to answer all knowledge items correctly on the post-test (odds ratio [OR] = 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-4.39) and to report having obtained a Pap smear in the past year (OR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.14-3.72) than women in the control groups.
CONCLUSION: Women who received the education program exhibited a greater knowledge about cervical cancer prevention and were more likely to have reported having had a Pap smear within the past year than women who did not receive the program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931612     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.22.1670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  19 in total

1.  Examining barriers to cervical cancer screening and treatment in Florida through a socio-ecological lens.

Authors:  Ellen Daley; Amina Alio; Erica H Anstey; Rasheeta Chandler; Karen Dyer; Hannah Helmy
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-02

2.  A comparison of two Native American Navigator formats: face-to-face and telephone.

Authors:  Mark B Dignan; Linda Burhansstipanov; Judy Hariton; Lisa Harjo; Terri Rattler; Rose Lee; Mondi Mason
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.302

3.  Interventions that increase use of Pap tests among ethnic minority women: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hae-Ra Han; Jiyun Kim; Jong-Eun Lee; Haley K Hedlin; Heejung Song; Youngshin Song; Miyong T Kim
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Healthy Living Partnerships to Prevent Diabetes (HELP PD): design and methods.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Katula; Mara Z Vitolins; Erica L Rosenberger; Caroline Blackwell; Mark A Espeland; Michael S Lawlor; W Jack Rejeski; David C Goff
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2009-09-13       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Factors associated with a positive attitude towards receiving cancer information: a population-based study in Spain.

Authors:  Belén Sanz-Barbero; María Eugenia Prieto; Naiara Cambas
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.377

6.  A Guide for Health Professionals Working with Aboriginal Peoples: Cross Cultural Understanding.

Authors: 
Journal:  J SOGC       Date:  2001-02

7.  Improving health promotion to American Indians in the midwest United States: preferred sources of health information and its use for the medical encounter.

Authors:  Mugur V Geana; K Allen Greiner; Angelia Cully; Myrietta Talawyma; Christine Makosky Daley
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2012-12

8.  Strategies for Increasing Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst First Nations Communities in Northwest Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Marion Maar; Pamela Wakewich; Brianne Wood; Alberto Severini; Julian Little; Ann N Burchell; Gina Ogilvie; Ingeborg Zehbe
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2014-11-24

Review 9.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Faith Moves Mountains: an Appalachian cervical cancer prevention program.

Authors:  Nancy E Schoenberg; Jennifer Hatcher; Mark B Dignan; Brent Shelton; Sherry Wright; Kaye F Dollarhide
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.