Literature DB >> 8931526

Walking ability of stroke patients: efficacy of tibial nerve blocking and a polypropylene ankle-foot orthosis.

H Beckerman1, J Becher, G J Lankhorst, A L Verbeek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of tibial nerve blocking by percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation and an ankle-foot orthosis on the walking ability of stroke patients with a spastic equinus or equinovarus foot.
DESIGN: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial with a 2 x 2 factorial design and with a 3-month follow-up.
SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a department of rehabilitation medicine.
SUBJECTS: Sixty stroke patients (17 women, 43 men) with a median age of 58 years and a median period of 34 months poststroke were allocated to one of four treatment groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in walking ability (measured with the Sickness Impact Profile category "ambulation"; possible score range, 0% to 100%) and walking speed after 3 months.
RESULTS: With respect to walking ability, the efficacy of thermocoagulation as compared with placebo thermocoagulation was .56% (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.01% to 4.13%), whereas the efficacy of the ankle-foot orthosis as compared with the placebo ankle-foot orthosis was 2.72% (95% CI -.94% to 6.38%). To study the potential synergistic effect of both treatments, a multivariate model was used; interaction between both treatments was small, .83% (95% CI -6.73% to 8.40%). Analysis restricted to the compliers (n = 30) showed an increased efficacy of thermocoagulation and a decreased efficacy of the ankle-foot orthosis. The changes in comfortable and maximal safe walking speed were less than .10m/sec and were neither clinically nor statistically significant (the median baseline values for the total group were .42m/sec and .56m/sec, respectively).
CONCLUSION: No support was found for the beneficial effects of either thermocoagulation of the tibial nerve or a polypropylene ankle-foot orthosis in 5 degrees of dorsiflexion on the walking ability of stroke patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931526     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90138-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Smallest real difference, a link between reproducibility and responsiveness.

Authors:  H Beckerman; M E Roebroeck; G J Lankhorst; J G Becher; P D Bezemer; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  WITHDRAWN: Orthotic devices after stroke and other non-progressive brain lesions.

Authors:  Sarah F Tyson; Ruth M Kent
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

3.  The effects of two different ankle-foot orthoses on gait of patients with acute hemiparetic cerebrovascular accident.

Authors:  Noel Rao; Jason Wening; Daniel Hasso; Gnanapradeep Gnanapragasam; Priyan Perera; Padma Srigiriraju; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-09

Review 4.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Temporal Synergies Detection in Gait Cyclograms Using Wearable Technology.

Authors:  Marija M Gavrilović; Milica M Janković
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Immediate synergistic effect of a trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force and an ankle-foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait.

Authors:  Junji Katsuhira; Sumiko Yamamoto; Nodoka Machida; Yuji Ohmura; Masako Fuchi; Mizuho Ohta; Setsuro Ibayashi; Arito Yozu; Ko Matsudaira
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.458

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.