Literature DB >> 8931212

Data analysis issues for protocols with overlapping enrollment.

K Larntz1, J D Neaton, D N Wentworth, T Yurik.   

Abstract

Many persons with HIV require and take several medications. The efficacy and safety of many of these medications are uncertain. Usually limited data on drug interactions are available. Thus simultaneous and sequential enrolment of patients into multiple studies is desired for reasons of science and efficiency. This paper discusses the analysis of data arising from coenrolment in multiple studies sponsored by the Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS (CPCRA). Factorial designs and those in which patients are sequentially instead of simultaneously randomized are compared. Approaches to data analysis, based on intention-to-treat, for individual and pairs of trials are described. An antiretroviral trial and a trial for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) are used for illustration. We conclude that such analyses may yield useful information on drug interactions and that a more vigorous coenrolment policy should be pursued in AIDS research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931212     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19961130)15:22<2445::aid-sim462>3.0.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  7 in total

Review 1.  Making co-enrolment feasible for randomised controlled trials in paediatric intensive care.

Authors:  Katie Harron; Twin Lee; Tracy Ball; Quen Mok; Carrol Gamble; Duncan Macrae; Ruth Gilbert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Co-enrollment of critically ill patients into multiple studies: patterns, predictors and consequences.

Authors:  Deborah Cook; Ellen McDonald; Orla Smith; Nicole Zytaruk; Diane Heels-Ansdell; Irene Watpool; Tracy McArdle; Andrea Matte; France Clarke; Shirley Vallance; Simon Finfer; Pauline Galt; Tim Crozier; Rob Fowler; Yaseen Arabi; Clive Woolfe; Neil Orford; Richard Hall; Neill K J Adhikari; Marie-Clauide Ferland; John Marshall; Maureen Meade
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 3.  Ethical and scientific considerations for patient enrollment into concurrent clinical trials.

Authors:  Paul S Myles; Elizabeth Williamson; Justin Oakley; Andrew Forbes
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  Co-enrolment of Participants into Multiple Cancer Trials: Benefits and Challenges.

Authors:  F H Cafferty; C Coyle; S Rowley; L Berkman; M MacKensie; R E Langley
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.126

5.  Methods in the design and implementation of the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) clinical trial.

Authors:  Martha A Q Curley; Rainer G Gedeit; Brenda L Dodson; June K Amling; Deborah J Soetenga; Christiane O Corriveau; Lisa A Asario; David Wypij
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Strategy for addressing research-site overlap in pragmatic clinical trials: lessons learned from the NIH-DOD-VA Pain Management Collaboratory (PMC).

Authors:  Mary Geda; Steven Z George; Diana J Burgess; Dylan V Scarton; William T Roddy; Kirsha S Gordon; Paul F Pasquina; Cynthia A Brandt; Robert D Kerns; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Patient and caregiver engagement in research: factors that influence co-enrollment in research.

Authors:  Leanne K Elliott; Herman Bami; Maxwell J Gelkopf; Ryan C Yee; Brian M Feldman; Y Ingrid Goh
Journal:  Pediatr Rheumatol Online J       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.054

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.