Literature DB >> 8931066

Perceptions of a 'good' death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients.

S A Payne1, A Langley-Evans, R Hillier.   

Abstract

The literature suggests that health professionals working in palliative care have developed an idealised concept of dying which has been labelled the 'good' death. This paper reports the results of a preliminary qualitative study which compared the concepts of a 'good' death used by patients and staff in a palliative care unit. Semistructured interviews designed to elicit perceptions of 'good' and 'bad' deaths were conducted with 18 patients and 20 health professionals. The transcribed interviews were content analysed. There were major differences between the views of patients and staff. The patients' descriptions of a "good' death were diverse and included: dying in one's sleep, dying quietly, with dignity, being pain free and dying suddenly. In comparison, staff characterised a "good' death in terms of adequate symptom control, family involvement, peacefulness and lack of distress, while a "bad' death was described as involving uncontrolled symptoms, lack of acceptance and being young. The findings suggest that patients and staff differ in their conceptualisations of a "good' death.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931066     DOI: 10.1177/026921639601000406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Palliat Med        ISSN: 0269-2163            Impact factor:   4.762


  17 in total

1.  Patient centred death.

Authors:  Jocalyn Clark
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-26

2.  Factors important to patients' quality of life at the end of life.

Authors:  Baohui Zhang; Matthew E Nilsson; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-13

Review 3.  An analysis of "dignity".

Authors:  P R Johnson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  1998-08

4.  An intense and unforgettable experience: the lived experience of malignant wounds from the perspectives of patients, caregivers and nurses.

Authors:  Susan J Alexander
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Defining a Good Death (Successful Dying): Literature Review and a Call for Research and Public Dialogue.

Authors:  Emily A Meier; Jarred V Gallegos; Lori P Montross Thomas; Colin A Depp; Scott A Irwin; Dilip V Jeste
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 6.  End-of-life care--what do cancer patients want?

Authors:  Shaheen A Khan; Barbara Gomes; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  What "best practice" could be in Palliative Care: an analysis of statements on practice and ethics expressed by the main Health Organizations.

Authors:  Gaia Barazzetti; Claudia Borreani; Guido Miccinesi; Franco Toscani
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  The importance of good death components among cancer patients, the general population, oncologists, and oncology nurses in Japan: patients prefer "fighting against cancer".

Authors:  Mitsunori Miyashita; Sachiko Kawakami; Daiki Kato; Hideomi Yamashita; Hiroshi Igaki; Kimiko Nakano; Yujiro Kuroda; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Using modeling to inform patient-centered care choices at the end of life.

Authors:  Negin Hajizadeh; Kristina Crothers; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.744

10.  Creation and the empirical validation of the dignity card-sort tool to assess factors influencing erosion of dignity at life's end.

Authors:  Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Helena Chmura Kraemer; Arthur Noda
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.