Literature DB >> 8930561

Gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with coronary artery disease: how common is it and does it matter?

A J Mehta1, J S de Caestecker, A J Camm, T C Northfield.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of spontaneous gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) on symptoms and cardiac ischaemia in patients with coronary artery disease.
DESIGN: Simultaneous 24-h ambulatory oesophageal pH, 7-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring and symptom diary in patients taking their usual anti-anginal medication.
SETTING: Regional cardiothoracic unit and gastroenterology unit of a teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: Twenty-four patients (20 males, 4 females, mean age 59 years) with post-myocardial infarction angina and angiographically proven coronary artery disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantitation of acid gastro-oesophageal reflux (% total time pH < 4, number of reflux episodes, duration of reflux episodes), identification of ST segment elevation or depression of 1 mm or more on 24-h ECG recording and occurrence of chest pain ("heartburn' or "angina') within 5 min of GOR or ischaemic ST segment shift.
RESULTS: There were 568 episodes of GOR, 28 of which were symptomatic. Abnormal GOR (% total time pH < 4 greater than 7%) occurred in 9 (38%) of the patients; all reflux parameters were increased in nitrate users compared to non-users (P < 0.05). Ischaemic ST-segment shift was seen on 113 occasions. Of a total of 41 chest pain episodes, 20 were related to GOR ("angina' with 8, "heartburn' with 12), while 8 coincided with both GOR and ST depression together ("angina' in 5, "heartburn' in 3). In addition to these eight episodes, coincidence of ST depression with GOR occurred on another nine occasions (all asymptomatic).
CONCLUSION: GOR is common in patients with coronary artery disease and may be increased by drug therapy; GOR may occasionally be associated with myocardial ischaemia, but this is uncommonly symptomatic; GOR-induced pain is sometimes mistaken for angina. These effects were uncommon overall, but frequent in a few individuals and should be considered in the evaluation of patients with persistent chest pain despite seemingly adequate antianginal treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8930561     DOI: 10.1097/00042737-199610000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

1.  Do calcium antagonists contribute to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and concomitant noncardiac chest pain?

Authors:  Jeff Hughes; Judith Lockhart; Andrew Joyce
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Esophageal visceral pain sensitivity: effects of TENS and correlation with manometric findings.

Authors:  M Börjesson; M Pilhall; T Eliasson; H Norssell; C Mannheimer; P Rolny
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and coronary heart disease: A nationwide population-based analysis.

Authors:  Chien-Hua Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Risk of acute myocardial infarction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: A nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Wei-Yi Lei; Jen-Hung Wang; Shu-Hui Wen; Chih-Hsun Yi; Jui-Sheng Hung; Tso-Tsai Liu; William C Orr; Chien-Lin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Is Noncardiac Chest Pain Truly Noncardiac?

Authors:  Hiroki Teragawa; Chikage Oshita; Yuichi Orita
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.