Literature DB >> 8930240

Neural processing of stereopsis as a function of viewing distance in primate visual cortical area V1.

Y Trotter1, S Celebrini, B Stricanne, S Thorpe, M Imbert.   

Abstract

1. The influence of viewing distance on disparity selectivity was investigated in area V1 of behaving monkeys. While the animals performed a fixation task, cortical cells were recorded extracellularly in the foveal representation of the visual field. Disparity selectivity was assessed by using static random dot stereograms (RDSs) through red/green filters flashed over the central fixation target. To determine the influence of the viewing distance, a color video monitor was positioned at fixed distances of 20, 40, or 80 cm. The same RDSs with the same angular size of dots were used at the three distances. 2. Disparity sensitivity was tested on 139 cells, of which 78 were analyzed at two or more distances and the rest (61) at a single distance. When disparity selectivity was analyzed at a given distance, about half the cells were found to be selective at 40 or 80 cm, but only a third at 20 cm. Near cells were > or = 1.5 times more common than far cells at all three distances. The latency distribution of the responses of disparity-selective (DS) cells was similar at all three distances, with a mean distribution centered around 60 ms. 3. Changing the viewing distance drastically affected the neural activity of the V1 neurons. The visual responsiveness of 60 of 78 cells (77%) was significantly changed. Disparity selectivity could be present at a given distance and absent at other(s), with often a loss of visual response. This emergence of disparity coding was the strongest effect (28 of 78 or 36%) and occurred more frequently from short to long distances. Among the cells that remained disparity insensitive at all recorded distances (31 of 78 or 40%), about half also showed modulations of the amplitude of the visual response. For cells that remained DS at all recorded distances (13 of 78 or 17%), changing the viewing distance also affected the sharpness (or magnitude) of disparity coding in terms of level of visual responsiveness and those changes were often combined with variations in tuning width. In only two cells did the peak of selectivity type change. Finally, the activity of four DS cells was not affected at all by the viewing distance. 4. Another effect concerned the level of ongoing activity (OA), defined as being the neural activity in darkness preceding the flash of the visual stimulus while the monkey was fixating the small bright target. Changing the viewing distance resulted in significant changes in OA level for more than half of the cells (41 of 78 or 53%). The most common effect was an increase in OA level at the shorter distance. The modulations of both visual responsiveness and OA could occur simultaneously, although they often had opposite signs. Indeed, the two effects were statistically independent of each other, i.e., modulations of visual responses were not related to the level of excitability of the neurons. 5. Control experiments were performed that showed that the effects of changing the viewing distance were not due to the retinal patterns in that the modulations of visual responsiveness were independent of the dot density. Seventeen cells were also tested for a possible effect of vergence by the use of prisms. When there was an effect of distance, it could be closely or partially reproduced by using prisms. These controls, together with the effects observed on OA, strongly suggest that the modulations of neural activity of the V1 neurons by the viewing distance are extraretinal in origin, probably proprioceptive. 6. The modulation of visual responsiveness by the viewing distance in the primary visual cortex indicates that integration of information from both retinal and extraretinal sources can occur early in the visual processing pathway for cortical representation of three-dimensional space. A functional scheme of three-dimensional cortical circuitry is discussed that shows cortical areas where disparity selectivity and modulations of visual activity by the angle of gaze have been described so far.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8930240     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1996.76.5.2872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  15 in total

1.  Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity.

Authors:  B G Cumming; A J Parker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Measuring V1 receptive fields despite eye movements in awake monkeys.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Parietal reach region encodes reach depth using retinal disparity and vergence angle signals.

Authors:  Rajan Bhattacharyya; Sam Musallam; Richard A Andersen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Reaching in depth: hand position dominates over binocular eye position in the rostral superior parietal lobule.

Authors:  Stefano Ferraina; Emiliano Brunamonti; Maria Assunta Giusti; Stefania Costa; Aldo Genovesio; Roberto Caminiti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category.

Authors:  G R Fink; J C Marshall; P W Halligan; C D Frith; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Marginalization in neural circuits with divisive normalization.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Beck; Peter E Latham; Alexandre Pouget
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Retinal versus physical stimulus size as determinants of visual perception in simultanagnosia.

Authors:  Elisabeth Huberle; Jon Driver; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Asymmetries in perception of 3D orientation.

Authors:  Allan C Dobbins; Jon K Grossmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effect of vertical disparities on depth representation in macaque monkeys: MT physiology and behavior.

Authors:  Syed A Chowdhury; Daniel L Christiansen; Michael L Morgan; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Fix your eyes in the space you could reach: neurons in the macaque medial parietal cortex prefer gaze positions in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Kostas Hadjidimitrakis; Rossella Breveglieri; Giacomo Placenti; Annalisa Bosco; Silvio P Sabatini; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.