Literature DB >> 8930224

Use of clinical practice guidelines in managed care physician groups.

E Fang1, B S Mittman, S Weingarten.   

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the use of clinical guidelines as a tool to improve the quality and cost-effectiveness of health care. Yet, relatively little data are available regarding the use of guidelines by health care provider organizations. We developed a written descriptive survey investigating the development, implementation, and evaluation of clinical guidelines that was administered to medical directors or their designees from physician medical groups and independent practice associations. Eighty-seven percent of physician organizations were reported to be developing or implementing clinical guidelines. The reasons most often cited for developing clinical guidelines were quality improvement and cost containment. Local expert opinion or judgment was rated as the most important influence in the development of clinical guidelines, followed by medical and scientific literature and externally developed guidelines. Feedback of information was the most popular method of increasing compliance with clinical guidelines, although 19% of physician organizations reported imposing sanctions on physicians who did not use guidelines. Most of the physician organizations surveyed have embraced clinical guidelines. Local development or adaptation of clinical guidelines may be common. There has been disproportionately little attention paid to guideline implementation and to evaluation of guideline effects relative to their development.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8930224     DOI: 10.1001/archfami.5.9.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Fam Med        ISSN: 1063-3987


  6 in total

Review 1.  How to judge practice guidelines.

Authors:  S Weingarten
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-06

2.  Comparison of indicators assessing the quality of drug prescribing for asthma.

Authors:  C C Veninga; P Denig; L G Pont; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Implementation science and urban health research.

Authors:  Sebastian Bonner
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Improving access to cancer guidelines: feedback from health care professionals.

Authors:  I S Sahota; X Kostaras; N A Hagen
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Barriers between guidelines and improved patient care: an analysis of AHCPR's Unstable Angina Clinical Practice Guideline. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.

Authors:  D A Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Designing an intervention to prevent suicide: PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial).

Authors:  M L Bruce; J L Pearson
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.986

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.