Literature DB >> 8929322

Subperiosteal minimally invasive laser endoscopic rhytidectomy: the SMILE facelift.

O M Ramirez1, J N Pozner.   

Abstract

Current concepts of total facial rejuvenation involve a comprehensive integrated approach to achieve a balanced youthful appearance. Recently introduced endoscopic-assisted techniques allow us to rejuvenate the face through small, remote incisions. Previously, we have considered only young patients with good skin turgor as candidates for minimally invasive procedures, but the advent of the resurfacing laser has allowed us to expand our indications for single stage minimal access rejuvenation. Full facial immediate laser resurfacing at the time of standard rhytidectomy has been avoided due to risk of flap necrosis. Subperiosteal minimally invasive endoscopic assisted techniques do not substantially interfere with facial blood supply. We can now perform endoscopic-assisted full facelifts combined with immediate laser resurfacing to reposition the tissues in a more youthful position and then tighten the skin envelope. Extended endoscopic-assisted subperiosteal forehead lift is performed through three to five scalp incisions; subperiosteal midface lift is performed through a crow's foot or intraoral incision. Cervicoplasty, if needed, is performed through a small submental incision. Full face laser resurfacing is done using a Coherent Ultrapulse laser. To date we have performed eleven subperiosteal minimally invasive laser endoscopic (SMILE) rhytidectomies. There has been no evidence of flap necrosis with this technique. Postoperative recovery has been no different from patients treated only by full face resurfacing, except perhaps for the slight increase in early facial edema. We believe the SMILE facelift is a viable alternative to standard techniques. The limitations of this procedure still need to be elucidated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8929322     DOI: 10.1007/bf00449248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  8 in total

1.  Arterial anatomy of the face: an analysis of vascular territories and perforating cutaneous vessels.

Authors:  T P Whetzel; S J Mathes
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Animal study of skin resurfacing using the ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser.

Authors:  C C Yang; C Y Chai
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 1.539

3.  Changes of the midface with age.

Authors:  N J Yousif
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.017

4.  The subperiosteal approach for the correction of the deep nasolabial fold and the central third of the face.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Simultaneous deep-plane face lift and trichloroacetic acid peel.

Authors:  D L Dingman; J Hartog; M Siemionow
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  A comparison of flap vascular anatomy in three rhytidectomy techniques.

Authors:  R H Schuster; W B Gamble; S T Hamra; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Endoscopic subperiosteal browlift and facelift.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  Endoscopic full facelift.

Authors:  O M Ramirez
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.326

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Raising the suborbicularis oculi fat (SOOF): its role in chronic facial palsy.

Authors:  J M Olver
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.638

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.