Literature DB >> 8929239

[The relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of standardized myrtol].

T Zimmermann1, M Seiberling, P Thomann, D Karabelnik.   

Abstract

An open, randomized cross-over trial was performed in 20 healthy volunteers to evaluate the relative bioavailability and the pharmacokinetics of myrtol standardized, the active ingredient of Gelomyrtol and Gelomyrtole forte capsules (abbreviated as GE and GF, respectively, in the following text). The male subjects, aged 19 to 42 years, were given in a randomized manner 1 capsule of GE (120 mg myrtol stand.) uncrushed, 1 capsule of GE crushed, 1 capsule of GF (300 mg myrtol stand.) uncrushed and 1 capsule of GF crushed on 4 different days. The time of administration was always about 8 a.m. and the medication had to be swallowed with 200 ml water. The 4 study sessions were separated (correction of spearated] by at [correction of a] least 6 days. Prior to and 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 120, 150 min and 3, 4, 5, 8, 12 and 24 h after medication at least 10 ml blood were taken from an antecubital vein. The blood samples were centrifuged within 20 min, the plasma was separated, and transferred into tubes and immediately deep-frozen at -20 degrees centigrade. From GE capsules cineol as main component was absorbed to 93,2% and from GF capsules to 95,6% based on the comparison of the uncrushed with the crushed capsules. The geometric mean of Cmax was 72,4 ng/ml for GE uncrushed capsules, a value of 33% below that for the crushed ones. The time to peak (tmax) was three times higher. With GF Cmax reached 238,2 ng/ml for the uncrushed capsules, a value of 36% below the one for the crushed ones and tmax was 67% higher. The time until the appearance of measurable plasma concentrations (tlag) was 7 and 5 times higher, respectively. These results show, that the main components of myrtol standardized, the active ingredient of GE and GF, are absorbed about 100% compared to the liquid form of administration (crushed capsule). The enteric coating of the capsules produces lower plasma peak-concentrations at later time points. This results in a plateau-like phase of the concentration/time curve between the 2nd and the 8th hour after application and reveals a considerable therapeutic advantage of the enteric coating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8929239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  4 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic evaluation of herbal remedies. Basic introduction, applicability, current status and regulatory needs.

Authors:  P A De Smet; J R Brouwers
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Is Myrtol® Standardized a New Alternative toward Antibiotics?

Authors:  Maria Paparoupa; Adrian Gillissen
Journal:  Pharmacogn Rev       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

Review 3.  Essential Oils as Multicomponent Mixtures and Their Potential for Human Health and Well-Being.

Authors:  Marek Bunse; Rolf Daniels; Carsten Gründemann; Jörg Heilmann; Dietmar R Kammerer; Michael Keusgen; Ulrike Lindequist; Matthias F Melzig; Gertrud E Morlock; Hartwig Schulz; Ralf Schweiggert; Meinhard Simon; Florian C Stintzing; Michael Wink
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Is it appropriate regarding patient preference to take Myrtol standardized enteric-coated soft capsules after a meal rather than at fasted state? A food-drug pharmacokinetic interaction study in healthy Chinese volunteers.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Zhao; Ling-Ling Zhu; Meng Chen; Quan Zhou
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.711

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.