Literature DB >> 8928984

Importance of findings on the initial evaluation for cancer in patients with symptomatic idiopathic deep venous thrombosis.

J Cornuz1, S D Pearson, M A Creager, E F Cook, L Goldman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relation between thrombosis and cancer is well documented, but the clinical evaluation appropriate for detecting underlying cancer in patients with deep venous thrombosis remains unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To 1) determine the appropriate initial evaluation for cancer in patients with idiopathic deep venous thrombosis and 2) estimate the incidence of subsequently diagnosed cancer in patients who were not found to have cancer when deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Urban, tertiary care teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 986 consecutive patients (637 women and 349 men; mean age +/- SD, 53 +/- 17 years) who had no risk factors for venous disease and had venous ultrasonography because idiopathic deep venous thrombosis was suspected. MEASUREMENTS: Initial clinical evaluation was assessed by using chart review. The incidence of cancer at a median of 34 months after diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis was obtained through hospital chart review (38%), computerized record extraction (54%), mailed questionnaires (6%), telephone interviews (1%), or a death registry (1%).
RESULTS: Deep venous thrombosis was diagnosed in 142 patients (14%); 136 of the 142 were hospitalized. Cancer was diagnosed in 16 of these 136 patients (12%) during the index hospitalization. All 16 of these patients had one or more abnormalities on at least one of the four components of the clinical examination: history, physical examination, basic laboratory testing, or chest radiography. The probability of detecting cancer increased as the number of findings suggestive of cancer on the four components of the clinical evaluation increased. Cancer was diagnosed in none of the 56 patients with deep venous thrombosis who did not have findings on the clinical evaluation. The probability of cancer-free survival during follow-up (median, 34 months) was similar in patients with (3 of 122 [2.5%]) and without (23 of 844 [2.7%]) deep venous thrombosis and in the age- and sex-matched U.S. population.
CONCLUSIONS: A clinical evaluation that includes a comprehensive medical history, physical examination, routine laboratory testing, and chest radiography seems to be appropriate for detecting cancer in these patients. Additional testing should be guided by any abnormalities detected by this clinical evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8928984     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-10-199611150-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  15 in total

1.  Should we look further for cancer in a patient with venous thromboembolism?

Authors:  D E Arterburn; W S Richardson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-05

2.  Screening for cancer in venous thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  T Fennerty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-29

3.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  The hypercoagulable state of malignancy: pathogenesis and current debate.

Authors:  Graham J Caine; Paul S Stonelake; Gregory Y H Lip; Sean T Kehoe
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.715

Review 5.  Venous thromboembolic disease and cancer.

Authors:  A Fennerty
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Venous thromboembolism and cancer risk among elderly adults in the United States.

Authors:  Morgan A Marks; Eric A Engels
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism.

Authors:  Steven R. Deitcher; Teresa L. Carman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002-06

8.  A pilot study utilizing whole body 18 F-FDG-PET/CT as a comprehensive screening strategy for occult malignancy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Matthew T Rondina; Nathan Wanner; Robert C Pendleton; Larry W Kraiss; Russell Vinik; Guy A Zimmerman; Marta Heilbrun; John M Hoffman; Kathryn A Morton
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.944

9.  A case of cerebral venous thrombosis as the presenting sign of occult prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sang Soo Lee; Shin Hye Baek; Dong-Ick Shin
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Idiopathic venous thromboembolic disease is associated with a poorer prognosis from subsequent malignancy.

Authors:  A Jones; D L Stockton; A J Simpson; J T Murchison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.