Literature DB >> 8928915

Intestinal fat differentially suppresses sham feeding of different gustatory stimuli.

L A Foster1, K Nakamura, D Greenberg, R Norgren.   

Abstract

To determine the intestinal contribution to short-term satiety for solutions of varying palatability, 10 ml of either 0.15 M NaCl or lipid (Intralipid: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 kcal/ml) was infused at a rate of 0.5 ml/min into the duodenum of rats that were sham feeding either a liquid diet (0.5 kcal/ml), 0.3 M sucrose (0.4 kcal/ml), or a 0.1 M solution of glucose polymers (Polycose 0.4 kcal/ml). Differences in palatability were estimated by the total consumption of each solution over 90 min in a one-bottle test. The intake of solutions maximally ingested during the saline infusions (Polycose > Sucrose > liquid diet) was the most sensitive to the lipid infusions. All four lipid concentrations suppressed intake of Polycose, the solution consumed the most; the three highest concentrations suppressed intake of sucrose (intermediate consumption), and only the two highest concentrations suppressed intake of the complete diet, the solution consumed the least. Nevertheless, the duration of suppression was shorter for the solutions the rats drank the most. For the solution the rats drank the least (liquid diet), the two high concentrations of lipid that suppressed intake did so for the entire experimental period, whereas for Polycose, al lipid infusions suppressed intake, but it recovered to control levels for all but the highest concentration. Other studies have reported that increasing diet palatability shortens the duration of satiety. The current results suggest that this effect may reflect the duration of intake suppression elicited by nutrients in the intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8928915     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1996.270.5.R1122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  5 in total

1.  Effect of intraduodenal lipid on parabrachial gustatory coding in awake rats.

Authors:  A Hajnal; K Takenouchi; R Norgren
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Amygdalofugal influence on processing of taste information in the nucleus of the solitary tract of the rat.

Authors:  Yi Kang; Robert F Lundy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Gustatory hedonic value: potential function for forebrain control of brainstem taste processing.

Authors:  Robert F Lundy
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Altered pontine taste processing in a rat model of obesity.

Authors:  Peter Kovacs; Andras Hajnal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Post-oral sugar detection rapidly and chemospecifically modulates taste-guided behavior.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.619

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.