Literature DB >> 8926545

Local luminance nonlinearity and receptor aliasing in the detection of high-frequency gratings.

S He1, D I MacLeod.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity for orientation discrimination is limited to spatial frequencies below 50-60 cycles per degree by neural spatial integration, and we find that contrast sensitivity, measured using an orientation-discrimination criterion, declines sharply with increasing spatial frequencies in that range. Yet interference fringe patterns pulsed at constant mean luminance can be detected at spatial frequencies far above that resolution limit [D.R. Williams, Vision Res. 25, 195 (1985)]. This is due at least in part to aliasing by the receptor mosaic, but another possible cue is provided by nonlinear distortion, which can create spatially uniform temporal transients when a pulsed fringe pattern is presented. We investigated the contribution of these spatially unstructured distortion products to grating detection by superimposing the pulsed fringe patterns on a randomly flickering uniform field. This manipulation has almost no effect on contrast sensitivity well below the resolution limit. Just above the resolution limit, however, the random luminance mask greatly elevates the fringe pattern detection threshold, suggesting that spatially unstructured cues provide the basis for detection in this range. At still higher fringe pattern frequencies, which approximately match the cone mosaic, the random luminance flicker again becomes ineffective for some observers, creating a clear secondary peak in contrast sensitivity in the flicker mask condition, which is presumably due to spatially structured cues provided by aliasing with the cone mosaic. The aliasing peak is still more clearly demarcated if the subject sets contrast thresholds for the perception of pattern as such. The contrast sensitivity function then has a notch or gap between the normal sensitivity range and the aliasing range. Apparently, in the unmasked case, spatially uniform cues (changes in overall color and brightness) bridge this gap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8926545     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.13.001139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  4 in total

1.  Fine structure of parvocellular receptive fields in the primate fovea revealed by laser interferometry.

Authors:  M J McMahon; M J Lankheet; P Lennie; D R Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effect of sampling array irregularity and window size on the discrimination of sampled gratings.

Authors:  David W Evans; Yizhong Wang; Kevin M Haggerty; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Neural bandwidth of veridical perception across the visual field.

Authors:  Michael O Wilkinson; Roger S Anderson; Arthur Bradley; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Encoding Information From Rotations Too Rapid To Be Consciously Perceived as Rotating: A Replication of the Motion Bridging Effect on a Liquid Crystal Display.

Authors:  Maximilian Stein; Robert Fendrich; Uwe Mattler
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.