Literature DB >> 8923853

Yearly stepwise increments of the growth hormone dose results in a better growth response after four years in girls with Turner syndrome. Dutch Working Group on Growth Hormone.

A van Teunenbroek1, S M de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, T Stijnen, M Jansen, B J Otten, H A Delemarre-van de Waal, T Vulsma, J M Wit, C W Rouwé, H M Reeser, J J Gosen, C Rongen-Westerlaken, S L Drop.   

Abstract

To optimize the growth promoting effect of growth hormone (GH), 65 previously untreated girls with Turner syndrome (TS), chronological age (CA) 2-11 yr, were randomized into 3 dosage regimen groups: A, B, and C, with a daily recombinant-human GH dose during 4 study years of 4-4-4-4, 4-6-6-6, and 4-6-8-8 IU/m2 b.s. The first GH dosage increase in groups B and C resulted in a significantly higher mean height velocity (HV) compared with constant dose group A. During the third year, when the dose was raised again only in group C, mean HV was significantly higher in groups B and C than in group A, and in group C compared with group B. In year 4 only group C mean HV remained significantly higher than group A. The pattern of change in HSDSCA (Dutch-Swedish-Danish Turner references) was identical; however, in year 4 mean delta HSDSCA in group B also remained significantly higher than group A. After 4 yr GH treatment, the following was determined. 1) The mean delta HSDSCA was significantly higher for groups B and C compared with group A, but not significantly different between groups B and C. 2) Although significantly higher compared with estimated values for untreated Dutch girls with TS, bone maturation of the GH treated girls was not significantly different between groups. 3) It was positively related with the degree of bone age (BA) retardation at start of study and negatively with baseline CA. 4) Both the modified Index of Potential Height (mIPHRUS) and a recently developed Turner-specific final height (FH) prediction method (PTSRUS), based on regression coefficients for H, CA, and bone age, showed significant increases in mean FH prediction, without significant differences between groups. PTSRUS values were markedly higher than the mIPHRUS values. Dose dependency could be shown for the area under the curve (AUC) for GH, but delta HSDSCA was not linearly related with AUC. Baseline GH binding protein (BP) levels were in 84% of the cases within the normal age range; the decrease in mean levels after 6 months GH was not significant. Mean insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGFBP-3 plasma levels increased significantly, without significant differences between groups. delta HSDSCA during GH was dependent on IGF-I plasma levels at baseline and during the study period, beta-0.002 and beta-0.0004. Thus, a stepwise GH-dosing approach reduced the "waning" effect of the growth response after 4 yr treatment without undue bone maturation. FH prediction was not significantly different between treatment groups. Irrespective of the GH dose used, initiation of GH treatment at a younger age was beneficial after 4 yr GH when expressed as actual cm gained or as gain in FH prediction, but was not statistically significant when expressed as delta HSDSCA over the study period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923853     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.81.11.8923853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  8 in total

1.  Effects of growth hormone on body proportions in Turner syndrome compared with non-treated patients and normal women.

Authors:  A D Baldin; T Fabbri; A A Siviero-Miachon; A M Spinola-Castro; S H V Lemos-Marini; M T M Baptista; L F R D'Souza-Li; A T Maciel-Guerra; G Guerra
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  How useful are serum IGF-I measurements for managing GH replacement therapy in adults and children?

Authors:  Anna Pawlikowska-Haddal; Pinchas Cohen; David M Cook
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  A decade of growth hormone treatment in girls with Turner syndrome in the UK. UK KIGS Executive Group.

Authors:  P R Betts; G E Butler; M D Donaldson; D B Dunger; D I Johnston; C J Kelnar; J Kirk; D A Price; P Wilton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Final height in girls with Turner's syndrome treated with once or twice daily growth hormone injections. Dutch Advisory Group on Growth Hormone.

Authors:  T C Sas; S M de Muinck Keizer-Schrama; T Stijnen; A van Teunenbroek; A C Hokken-Koelega; J J Waelkens; G G Massa; T Vulsma; W J Gerver; H M Reeser; H E Delemarre-van de Waal; M Jansen; S L Drop
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 5.  Ovarian function in girls and women with GALT-deficiency galactosemia.

Authors:  Judith L Fridovich-Keil; Cynthia S Gubbels; Jessica B Spencer; Rebecca D Sanders; Jolande A Land; Estela Rubio-Gozalbo
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Real-life GH dosing patterns in children with GHD, TS or born SGA: a report from the NordiNet® International Outcome Study.

Authors:  Oliver Blankenstein; Marta Snajderova; Jo Blair; Effie Pournara; Birgitte Tønnes Pedersen; Isabelle Oliver Petit
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.664

7.  Turner syndrome: searching for better outcomes.

Authors:  Adauto Versiani Ramos; Ivani Novato Silva; Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  Pharmacogenomics of insulin-like growth factor-I generation during GH treatment in children with GH deficiency or Turner syndrome.

Authors:  A Stevens; P Clayton; L Tatò; H W Yoo; M D Rodriguez-Arnao; J Skorodok; G R Ambler; M Zignani; J Zieschang; G Della Corte; B Destenaves; A Champigneulle; J Raelson; P Chatelain
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.550

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.