Literature DB >> 8923817

Discrimination learning decreases perceived similarity according to an objective measure.

D L King1, S C Shanks, L L Hart.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Initial identification discriminations between two sizes and between two slants produced better overall performances on subsequent size and slant same-different discriminations, respectively. This size- and slant-specific transfer was due to an improvement on only the different pairs. Time-duration identification discriminations with the identical stimuli and response assignments improved neither overall same-different performances nor performances on different pairs. A good performance on different pairs relative to same pairs should indicate a low perceived similarity. The literature indicates that A-X and B-Y pairings produce a positive transfer on an A-versus-B discrimination when X and Y are relatively low in similarity, and also indicates that a low perceived (not physical) similarity improves discrimination learning. An increase in salience should have also improved performance on the same pairs. THE
CONCLUSION: the initial discriminations decreased the perceived similarity of parts (size or slant). This decrease resembles perceptual contrast. A discrimination between two parts also seems to increase the extent to which each part is apprehended as a separate group. Therefore, the conclusion accords with the position that two groups are associated with contrast, including for visibility.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923817     DOI: 10.1007/bf00425833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  32 in total

1.  Effects of three types of pretraining on discrimination learning in preschool children.

Authors:  G N CANTOR
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1955-05

2.  Perceptual learning; differentiation or enrichment?

Authors:  J J GIBSON; E J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Effect of concurrent responses on the evocation and generalization of the conditioned eyeblink.

Authors:  G R GRICE; J D DAVIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1960-06

4.  Effects of discrimination performance of similarity of previously acquired stimulus names.

Authors:  K J NORCROSS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1958-10

5.  Fast perceptual learning in visual hyperacuity.

Authors:  T Poggio; M Fahle; S Edelman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  "Same"-"different" response times with multi-attribute stimulus differences.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1967-04

7.  Group, assimilation, and increase in visibility association without a difference in features.

Authors:  D L King
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1997

8.  A large rectangle delays the perception of a separate small rectangle.

Authors:  D L King
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-04

9.  Orientation-specific learning in stereopsis.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; O Braddick
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Response competition effects in same-different judgments.

Authors:  C W Eriksen; W P O'Hara; B Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.