Literature DB >> 8923544

Branching of active dendritic spines as a mechanism for controlling synaptic efficacy.

D A Rusakov1, M G Stewart, S M Korogod.   

Abstract

Recent experimental findings (Yuste R. and Denk W. (1995) Nature 375, 682-684) suggest that dendritic spines possess excitable membranes. Theoretically, it was shown earlier that the shape of active spines can significantly affect somatopetal synaptic signal transfer. Studies of long-term potentiation in the hippocampus have related the increased synaptic efficacy to a number of structural modifications of spines, including an increased number of branched spines [Trommald M. et al. (1990) In Neurotoxicity of Excitatory Amino Acids, pp. 163-174. Raven Press, New York] and a strengthened capability for spines to alter their spatial positions [Hosokawa T. et al. (1995) J. Neurosci. 15, 5560-5573]. In the present simulation study, the potential physiological impact of several types of spine changes was examined in a compartmental neuron model built using the neuromodelling software NEURON [Hines M. (1993) In Neural Systems: Analysis and Modeling, pp. 127-136. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA]. The model included 30 complex spines, with dual component synaptic currents and mechanisms of Ca2+ uptake, diffusion, binding and extrusion within spine heads. The results show that local clustering properties of spine distributions along dendrites are unlikely to affect synaptic efficacy. However, partial fusion of active spines, which results in formation of spine branches, or subtle changes in spine branch positions, could alone significantly increase synaptic signal transfer. These data illustrate possible mechanisms whereby subtle morphological changes in dendritic spines (compatible with changes reported in the literature) may be linked to the cellular mechanisms of learning and memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923544     DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(96)00253-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  Postsynaptic calcium transients evoked by activation of individual hippocampal mossy fiber synapses.

Authors:  C A Reid; R Fabian-Fine; A Fine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The roles of dendritic spine shapes in Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Kea Joo Lee; Hyun Kim; Im Joo Rhyu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Reduced Microglial Activity and Enhanced Glutamate Transmission in the Basolateral Amygdala in Early CNS Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Shaona Acharjee; Megan Verbeek; Carlos D Gomez; Kanchan Bisht; Benjamin Lee; Lucas Benoit; Keith A Sharkey; Adrienne Benediktsson; Marie-Eve Tremblay; Quentin J Pittman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  FIB/SEM technology and high-throughput 3D reconstruction of dendritic spines and synapses in GFP-labeled adult-generated neurons.

Authors:  Carles Bosch; Albert Martínez; Nuria Masachs; Cátia M Teixeira; Isabel Fernaud; Fausto Ulloa; Esther Pérez-Martínez; Carlos Lois; Joan X Comella; Javier DeFelipe; Angel Merchán-Pérez; Eduardo Soriano
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.856

5.  Dendritic spine dysgenesis in superficial dorsal horn sensory neurons after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Xiaoyu C Cao; Laura W Pappalardo; Stephen G Waxman; Andrew M Tan
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.395

6.  Reelin Regulates the Maturation of Dendritic Spines, Synaptogenesis and Glial Ensheathment of Newborn Granule Cells.

Authors:  Carles Bosch; Nuria Masachs; David Exposito-Alonso; Albert Martínez; Cátia M Teixeira; Isabel Fernaud; Lluís Pujadas; Fausto Ulloa; Joan X Comella; Javier DeFelipe; Angel Merchán-Pérez; Eduardo Soriano
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 5.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.