Literature DB >> 8923277

An in-vitro evaluation of the activity of povidone-iodine against nosocomial bacterial strains.

O Traoré1, S F Fayard, H Laveran.   

Abstract

Two povidone-iodine (PVP-I) preparations, one, an antiseptic handwash and one, a skin disinfectant, were tested against 504 bacterial strains isolated from nosocomial infections in 12 French hospitals. In vitro bactericidal activity was determined by a micromethod, using specific interfering substances over a range of dilutions, after 1, 3 and 5 min exposure times. A 5 log10 reduction of the challenge inoculum was considered as the criterion of efficacy. Any resistant strains were tested with the French Standard (T72300). When the micromethod was carried out at 20 degrees C, 10.7% (54/504) of the strains were resistant to the PVP-I skin disinfectant (dilution 1:10) and 1.6% (8/504) were resistant to the handwashing formulations (dilution 1:3) after 1 min exposure. By increasing the temperature to 32 degrees C, the resistance rate to the skin disinfectant fell to 1.9% (10/504). All of the 18 strains found resistant with the micromethod were sensitive using the French standard.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923277     DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(96)90069-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

Review 1.  Povidone-iodine: use in hand disinfection, skin preparation and antiseptic irrigation.

Authors:  Piyush Durani; David Leaper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Topical antimicrobial therapy of chronic wounds healing by secondary intention using iodine products.

Authors:  David J Leaper; Piyush Durani
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Iodine revisited.

Authors:  Rose A Cooper
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Antibiotic Delivery Strategies to Treat Skin Infections When Innate Antimicrobial Defense Fails.

Authors:  R Smith; J Russo; J Fiegel; N Brogden
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 5.  Hand Sanitizers: A Review on Formulation Aspects, Adverse Effects, and Regulations.

Authors:  Jane Lee Jia Jing; Thong Pei Yi; Rajendran J C Bose; Jason R McCarthy; Nagendran Tharmalingam; Thiagarajan Madheswaran
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of povidone-iodine and other commercially available antiseptics against clinically relevant pathogens.

Authors:  Eng Lee Tan; Nur Humaira Johari
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2021-01-26

Review 7.  Antimicrobial stewardship of antiseptics that are pertinent to wounds: the need for a united approach.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Maillard; Günter Kampf; Rose Cooper
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2021-03-25

8.  In Vitro Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Gargle/Mouthwash Against Respiratory and Oral Tract Pathogens.

Authors:  Maren Eggers; Torsten Koburger-Janssen; Markus Eickmann; Juergen Zorn
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2018-04-09

9.  Bactericidal and Virucidal Activity of Povidone-Iodine and Chlorhexidine Gluconate Cleansers in an In Vivo Hand Hygiene Clinical Simulation Study.

Authors:  Maren Eggers; Torsten Koburger-Janssen; Lois S Ward; Craig Newby; Stefan Müller
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2018-05-14

10.  Keratoprosthesis prophylaxis: is it time for a paradigm shift?

Authors:  J S Pelletier; S B Barone; J A Capriotii
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.