Literature DB >> 8922986

Response properties of units in the posterior auditory field deprived of input from the ipsilateral primary auditory cortex.

L M Kitzes1, G S Hollrigel.   

Abstract

The influence of the ipsilateral primary auditory field (AI) on the response properties of neurons in the posterior auditory field (Field P) was examined in three cats anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital. Rate/level functions were obtained, by extracellular recording, from single units in Field P before (n = 38) and after (n = 50) subpial aspiration of AI. The ablations were primarily confined to the medial ectosylvian gyrus, although in one case extended into the high-frequency portion of the anterior auditory field. Comparisons between the behavior of units isolated before and after AI ablation failed to demonstrate any changes in the response properties of neurons in Field P attributable to the ablation. Nonmonotonic response profiles, first spike latency, variability in latency, threshold and maximal discharge rates of the units to acoustic stimuli were not significantly altered by the AI ablation. These results indicate that the basic response properties of neurons in Field P do not depend on input from the ipsilateral AI. This suggests that these properties are most likely determined by thalamic input or by circuitry within Field P.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8922986     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00103-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

Review 1.  Thalamic and cortical pathways supporting auditory processing.

Authors:  Charles C Lee
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington; G Christopher Stecker; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Evidence for hierarchical processing in cat auditory cortex: nonreciprocal influence of primary auditory cortex on the posterior auditory field.

Authors:  Andres Carrasco; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Remodeling the cortex in memory: Increased use of a learning strategy increases the representational area of relevant acoustic cues.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Convergence of thalamic and cortical pathways in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; Jeffery A Winer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Information flow in the auditory cortical network.

Authors:  Troy A Hackett
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Learning strategy trumps motivational level in determining learning-induced auditory cortical plasticity.

Authors:  Kasia M Bieszczad; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Deficient Recurrent Cortical Processing in Congenital Deafness.

Authors:  Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf; Aly Lamuri; Peter Hubka; Jochen Tillein; Martin Vinck; Andrej Kral
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.