Literature DB >> 8922453

The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.

J Katz1.   

Abstract

The Nuremberg Code includes 10 principles to guide physician-investigators in experiments involving human subjects. These principles, particularly the first principle on "voluntary consent," primarily were based on legal concepts because medical codes of ethics existent at the time of the Nazi atrocities did not address consent and other safeguards for human subjects. The US judges who presided over the proceedings did not intend the Code to apply only to the case before them, to be a response to the atrocities committed by the Nazi physicians, or to be inapplicable to research as it is customarily carried on in medical institutions. Instead, a careful reading of the judgment suggests that they wrote the Code for the practice of human experimentation whenever it is being conducted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Medical Association; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Nineteenth Century; Nuremberg Code; Nuremberg Trials; Twentieth Century

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8922453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  15 in total

Review 1.  Randomized surgical trials and "sham" surgery: relevance to modern orthopaedics and minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Brian R Wolf; Joseph A Buckwalter
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Surgical research in the UK.

Authors:  Thomas Edward Woodcock
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Medical Ethics in the 70 Years after the Nuremberg Code, 1947 to the Present.

Authors:  Herwig Czech; Christiane Druml; Paul Weindling
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Patients' experiences of intervention trials on the treatment of myocardial infarction: is it time to adjust the informed consent procedure to the patient's capacity?

Authors:  A Agård; G Hermerén; J Herlitz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Contextualising professional ethics: the impact of the prison context on the practices and norms of health care practitioners.

Authors:  Karolyn L A White; Christopher F C Jordens; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Reflections on the 70th Anniversary of the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial.

Authors:  George J Annas; Michael A Grodin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The women radium dial painters as experimental subjects (1920-1990) or what counts as human experimentation.

Authors:  Maria Rentetzi
Journal:  NTM       Date:  2004

8.  Examining consent within the patient-doctor relationship.

Authors:  M A Habiba
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Studying community consultation in exception from informed consent trials.

Authors:  Clifton W Callaway
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Doctor-patient relations in Nazi Germany and the fate of psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Irwin N Hassenfeld
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.