Literature DB >> 8922361

Immunologic effects of insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] in IDDM and NIDDM patients previously treated with insulin.

N S Fineberg1, S E Fineberg, J H Anderson, M A Birkett, R G Gibson, S Hufferd.   

Abstract

Insulin lispro [Lys (B28), Pro (B29) human insulin] is a rapidly absorbed analog that has diminished tendency to self-associate. In four open-label, 1-year-long international randomized trials, we contrasted the immunogenicity of insulin lispro versus regular human insulin (RHI) in patients previously treated with insulin who had IDDM or NIDDM. Using a self-blank subtraction assay, we assessed sera for the presence of insulin-specific antibodies (ISA), insulin lispro-specific antibodies (LSA), and cross-reactive antibodies (CRA). Basal insulin needs were provided either with human ultralente (UL) or NPH insulins. After 2 to 4 weeks of therapy with RHI plus UL or RHI plus NPH, 50% of patients were randomly assigned to begin insulin lispro or continue on RHI. At baseline, few pretreated patients had LSA (0-4%) and approximately 10% had ISA, whereas 41-45% of patients with IDDM and 23-27% of patients with NIDDM had CRA (IDDM vs. NIDDM, P < 0.001). Within studies, no significant differences were noted over time in ISA, LSA, or CRA attributable to the type of short-acting insulin. When data were pooled, inconsistent changes were noted in ISA and LSA (LSA were greater in NIDDM vs. IDDM at baseline, P = 0.001, and ISA were greater in IDDM vs. NIDDM at 6 months, P = 0.007). Significant levels of CRA were more common in IDDM at all times (P < 0.001, P = 0.022, and P = 0.002 at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively). For patients receiving insulin lispro, no significant changes occurred in antibody status among IDDM and NIDDM patients throughout the study (became positive, remained positive, became negative, or remained negative). IDDM patients were more likely to develop or maintain CRA levels (P = 0.008 vs. NIDDM), whereas antibody levels were comparable among positive individuals. No evidence was noted that insulin lispro differs in immunogenicity from RHI in previously treated IDDM and NIDDM patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8922361     DOI: 10.2337/diab.45.12.1750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes        ISSN: 0012-1797            Impact factor:   9.461


  14 in total

Review 1.  Insulin lispro: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Dene Simpson; Paul L McCormack; Gillian M Keating; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Insulin lispro: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M I Wilde; D McTavish
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Practical application of acid dissociation in monitoring patients treated with adalimumab.

Authors:  Francisca Llinares-Tello; José Rosas-Gómez de Salazar; José Miguel Senabre-Gallego; Gregorio Santos-Soler; Carlos Santos-Ramírez; Esteban Salas-Heredia; Xavier Barber-Vallés; Juan Molina-García
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 4.  Insulin lispro (Humalog), the first marketed insulin analogue: indications, contraindications and need for further study.

Authors:  A L Puttagunta; E L Toth
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-24       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Guidelines for using insulin lispro.

Authors:  E L Toth; K C Lee
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Birgit Fullerton; Andrea Siebenhofer; Klaus Jeitler; Karl Horvath; Thomas Semlitsch; Andrea Berghold; Johannes Plank; Thomas R Pieber; Ferdinand M Gerlach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-30

Review 7.  Allergic reactions to human insulin: a review of current knowledge and treatment options.

Authors:  Baris Akinci; Serkan Yener; Firat Bayraktar; Sena Yesil
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 8.  Immunogenicity of Protein Pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Robert Dingman; Sathy V Balu-Iyer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2018-12-30       Impact factor: 3.534

9.  Insulin glulisine in the management of diabetes.

Authors:  Satoru Yamada
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 10.  Immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins: the use of animal models.

Authors:  Vera Brinks; Wim Jiskoot; Huub Schellekens
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.