Literature DB >> 8922198

Rationale for the dosage and schedule of CPT-11 (irinotecan) selected for phase II studies, as determined by European phase I studies.

J P Armand1, Y M Extra, G Catimel, D Abigerges, M Marty, M Clavel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CPT-11 (irinotecan), a camptothecin-derived anticancer agent with DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitory activity, has demonstrated a broad spectrum of in vitro and in vivo activity in solid tumour models including multidrug-resistant tumours. This review details the rationale for the dosage schedule of CPT-11 selected for phase II studies, based on the results of 3 European phase I dose-escalating trials in patients with solid tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks (schedule 1), once daily for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks (schedule 2) or once weekly every 3 out of 4 weeks (schedule 3).
RESULTS: Neutropenia and diarrhoea were the major dose-limiting toxicities in all of the studies. The maximum tolerated dose of CPT-11 was 115 and 145 mg/m2/day for schedules 2 and 3, respectively. With schedule 1, diarrhoea became dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 but was manageable with high-dose loperamide therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 350 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks was chosen for further evaluation in early phase II studies, since this dosage regimen allowed the highest dose intensity with the least toxicity and was convenient for outpatient use. The place of higher doses (with intensive antidiarrhoeal support) and other administration schedules (e.g., protracted infusion) warrant further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8922198     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  7 in total

1.  Clinical implications of UGT1A1*28 genotype testing in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Katerina Shulman; Ilana Cohen; Ofra Barnett-Griness; Abraham Kuten; Stephen B Gruber; Flavio Lejbkowicz; Gad Rennert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Carboxylesterase inhibitors.

Authors:  M Jason Hatfield; Philip M Potter
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 6.674

3.  Different schedules of irinotecan administration: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yi Shao; Hui Lv; Dian-Sheng Zhong
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-03

4.  Phase 2 study of weekly irinotecan in adults with recurrent malignant glioma: final report of NABTT 97-11.

Authors:  Tracy T Batchelor; Mark R Gilbert; Jeffrey G Supko; Kathryn A Carson; Louis B Nabors; Stuart A Grossman; Glenn J Lesser; Tom Mikkelsen; Surasak Phuphanich
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature.

Authors:  Vincent J Venditto; Eric E Simanek
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  A phase I study of oral LY293111 given daily in combination with irinotecan in patients with solid tumours.

Authors:  Tara Baetz; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Lillian Siu; Martha MacLean; Karen Doppler; Wendy Walsh; Bryn Fisher; Azhar Z Khan; Dinesh P de Alwis; A Weitzman; Leslie H Brail; Malcolm Moore
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 3.651

7.  Sensitivity to CPT-11 of xenografted human colorectal cancers as a function of microsatellite instability and p53 status.

Authors:  R A Bras-Gonçalves; C Rosty; P Laurent-Puig; P Soulié; B Dutrillaux; M F Poupon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.