Literature DB >> 8921656

Perception of pain as a result of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances.

P A Scheurer1, A R Firestone, W B Bürgin.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the intensity, location and duration of patients' discomfort following insertion of orthodontic appliances, and to examine for interactions between patient age, gender, appliance type and the perception of pain. After insertion of orthodontic appliances, 170 patients received eight questionnaires, one they completed and returned after 4 h, then one daily for 7 days. The respondents' ages ranged from 8-53 years (median age 13 years 7 months); 45 per cent were male and 55 per cent female. Of the patients, 65 per cent reported pain after 4 h and 95 per cent after 24 h. After 7 days, 25 per cent of the patients still reported discomfort. Patients' pain intensity scores were significantly higher for the anterior than for the posterior teeth. On day 1, 16 per cent took analgesics and 18 per cent reported being awakened the first night. Comparing a 2 x 4 appliance, a full appliance in one arch and in both arches, no statistical differences were found for reported pain frequency, general intensity of pain, pain at the teeth, discomfort when biting and chewing and analgesic consumption. The perception of general pain intensity, analgesic consumption, pain when eating and the influence of discomfort on daily life were all significantly greater in girls than in boys. Patients younger than 13 years reported pain significantly less frequently than the older patients. The highest frequency of pain was found in the group of 13-16 year olds. The pain intensity did not differ among the age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8921656     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/18.4.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  80 in total

1.  Efficacy of Photobiomodulation Therapy for Orthodontic Pain Control Following the Placement of Elastomeric Separators: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  AmirHossein Mirhashemi; Seyedreza Rasouli; Shiva Shahi; Nasim Chiniforush
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-02-22

Review 2.  Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Nabeel F Talic
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-01-28

3.  The perception of pain following interdental microimplant treatment for skeletal anchorage: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Chun-Ming Chen; Chao-San Chang; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Kun-Rong Hsu; Kun-Tsung Lee; Huey-Er Lee
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.634

4.  Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Saritha Sivarajan; Jennifer Geraldine Doss; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne; Mang Chek Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Pain management for dentists: the role of ibuprofen.

Authors:  Alessandro Pozzi; Luca Gallelli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2012-04-15

6.  Biomechanical influence of anchorages on orthodontic space closing mechanics by sliding method.

Authors:  Zhan Liu; Tinghui Sun; Yubo Fan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Expectations, acceptance and preferences of patients in treatment with orthodontic mini-implants: part II: implant removal.

Authors:  Sandra Lehnen; Fraser McDonald; Christoph Bourauel; Andreas Jäger; Martin Baxmann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 8.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Patient survey on Invisalign® treatment comparing [corrected] the SmartTrack® material to the previously used [corrected] aligner material.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Bräscher; Dietmar Zuran; Robert E Feldmann; Justus Benrath
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 1.938

10.  Pain and discomfort experienced after placement of a conventional or a superelastic NiTi aligning archwire. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L M Fernandes; B Ogaard; L Skoglund
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.