Literature DB >> 8921269

Contrast-dependent dissociation of visual recognition and detection fields.

H Strasburger1, I Rentschler.   

Abstract

Seeing an object 'as something' is different from simply seeing it (see Watanabe, S., 1985, Pattern Recognition: Human and Mechanical, John Wiley). This distinction between recognition and detection often goes unnoticed in physiology and clinical practice, where visual performance is characterized in terms of acuity, visual field and contrast sensitivity. The corresponding functions of stimulus detection are consistent with the neural projection properties from the retina to the striate cortex, i.e. the 'cortical magnification theory'. Yet recognition performance for characters (Strasburger, H. et al., 1994, Eur. J. Neurosci., 6, 1583-1588) and grey-level patterns (Jüttner, M. and Reutschler, I., 1996, Vision Res., 36, 1007-1022) does not fit into this scheme. Here we show that this discrepancy results in the dissociation of visual recognition and detection fields, which is dramatic at low pattern contrast. Form proper can be appreciated exclusively within the much narrower field of recognition, the window of visual intelligence. Its function is, at low contrast, probably mediated by the magnocellular pathway and at all contrasts is determined by the processing characteristics of higher stages of the ventral visual pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8921269     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01322.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  10 in total

1.  The Tölz Temporal Topography Study: mapping the visual field across the life span. Part I: the topography of light detection and temporal-information processing.

Authors:  Dorothe A Poggel; Bernhard Treutwein; Claudia Calmanti; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Face or building superiority in peripheral vision reversed by task requirements.

Authors:  Najate Jebara; Delphine Pins; Pascal Despretz; Muriel Boucart
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-09-08

3.  Parafoveal letter recognition at reduced contrast in normal aging and in patients with risk factors for AMD.

Authors:  Gesa Astrid Hahn; Andre Messias; Manfred Mackeben; Klaus Dietz; Karin Horwath; Lea Hyvärinen; Markku Leinonen; Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  The characteristics and limits of rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Michèle Fabre-Thorpe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-03

5.  A matter of time: improvement of visual temporal processing during training-induced restoration of light detection performance.

Authors:  Dorothe A Poggel; Bernhard Treutwein; Bernhard A Sabel; Hans Strasburger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-11

6.  On the contrast dependence of crowding.

Authors:  Antonio Rodriguez; Richard Granger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  The dynamics of saliency-driven and goal-driven visual selection as a function of eccentricity.

Authors:  Elle van Heusden; Mieke Donk; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Functional Field of View Determined by Crowding, Aging, or Glaucoma Under Divided Attention.

Authors:  Foroogh Shamsi; Victoria Chen; Rong Liu; Valentina Pergher; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 9.  A review of the findings and theories on surface size effects on visual attention.

Authors:  Anne O Peschel; Jacob L Orquin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-09

10.  Blur Unblurred-A Mini Tutorial.

Authors:  Hans Strasburger; Michael Bach; Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2018-04-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.