Literature DB >> 8919774

Vibrio mimicus diarrhea following ingestion of raw turtle eggs.

E Campos1, H Bolaños, M T Acuña, G Díaz, M C Matamoros, H Raventós, L M Sánchez, O Sánchez, C Barquero.   

Abstract

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of diarrhea associated with Vibrio mimicus were identified in 33 hospitalized patients referred to the Costa Rican National Diagnostic Laboratory Network between 1991 and 1994. The relevant symptoms presented by patients included abundant watery diarrhea, vomiting, and severe dehydration that required intravenous Dhaka solution in 83% of patients but not fever. Seroconversion against V. mimicus was demonstrated in four patients, from whom acute- and convalescent-phase sera were obtained. Those sera did not show cross-reaction when tested against Vibrio cholerae O1 strain VC-12. All the V. mimicus isolates from these cases produced cholera toxin (CT) and were susceptible to commonly used antibiotics. Attempts to isolate this bacterium from stool samples of 127 healthy persons were not successful. Consumption of raw turtle eggs was recalled by 11 of the 19 (58%) individuals interviewed. All but two V. mimicus diarrheal cases were sporadic. These two had a history of a common source of turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs for consumption, and V. mimicus was isolated from eggs from the same source (a local market). Among the strains, variations in the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern were observed. None of the strains recovered from market turtle eggs nor the four isolates from river water showed CT production. Further efforts to demonstrate the presence of CT-producing V. mimicus strains in turtle eggs were made. Successful results were obtained when nest eggs were tested. In this case, it was possible to isolate CT- and non-CT-producing strains, even from the same egg. For CT detection we used PCR, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and Y-1 cell assay, obtaining a 100% correlation between ELISA and PCR results. Primers Col-1 and Col-2, originally described as specific for the V. cholerae O1 ctxA gene, also amplified a 302-bp segment with an identical restriction map from V. mimicus. These results have important implications for epidemiological surveillance in tropical countries where turtle eggs are used for human consumption, serving as potential sources of cholera-like diarrhea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8919774      PMCID: PMC167879          DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.4.1141-1144.1996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  15 in total

1.  Ecology of Vibrio mimicus in aquatic environments.

Authors:  M A Chowdhury; H Yamanaka; S Miyoshi; K M Aziz; S Shinoda
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Antibiotic resistance patterns of Vibrio mimicus isolated from human and environmental sources in Bangladesh.

Authors:  M A Chowdhury; K M Aziz; Z Rahim; B A Kay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Variation in epitopes of the B subunit of Vibrio cholerae non-O1 and Vibrio mimicus cholera toxins.

Authors:  M L Tamplin; R Jalali; M K Ahmed; R R Colwell
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Purification of enterotoxins from Vibrio mimicus that appear to be identical to cholera toxin.

Authors:  W M Spira; P J Fedorka-Cray
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Disease from infection with Vibrio mimicus, a newly recognized Vibrio species. Clinical characteristics and edipemiology.

Authors:  W X Shandera; J M Johnston; B R Davis; P A Blake
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Polymerase chain reaction for detection of the cholera enterotoxin operon of Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  H Shirai; M Nishibuchi; T Ramamurthy; S K Bhattacharya; S C Pal; Y Takeda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  [Isolation of Vibrio cholerae no-01 in the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica].

Authors:  F Antillón; E Rodríguez
Journal:  Rev Biol Trop       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 0.723

8.  Characterization of toxigenic vibrios isolated from the freshwater environment of Hiroshima, Japan.

Authors:  K Venkateswaran; C Kiiyukia; M Takaki; H Nakano; H Matsuda; H Kawakami; H Hashimoto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Toxin production by Vibrio mimicus strains isolated from human and environmental sources in Bangladesh.

Authors:  M A Chowdhury; K M Aziz; B A Kay; Z Rahim
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Characterization of biochemically atypical Vibrio cholerae strains and designation of a new pathogenic species, Vibrio mimicus.

Authors:  B R Davis; G R Fanning; J M Madden; A G Steigerwalt; H B Bradford; H L Smith; D J Brenner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  15 in total

1.  Analysis of 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio mimicus.

Authors:  J Chun; A Huq; R R Colwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparative genomics of clinical and environmental Vibrio mimicus.

Authors:  Nur A Hasan; Christopher J Grim; Bradd J Haley; Jongsik Chun; Munirul Alam; Elisa Taviani; Mozammel Hoq; A Christine Munk; Elizabeth Saunders; Thomas S Brettin; David C Bruce; Jean F Challacombe; J Chris Detter; Cliff S Han; Gary Xie; G Balakrish Nair; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Antibiotic resistance and plasmid profiling of Vibrio spp. in tropical waters of Peninsular Malaysia.

Authors:  K G You; C W Bong; C W Lee
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A novel triplex quantitative PCR strategy for quantification of toxigenic and nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Rupert Bliem; Sonja Schauer; Helga Plicka; Adelheid Obwaller; Regina Sommer; Adolf Steinrigl; Munirul Alam; Georg H Reischer; Andreas H Farnleitner; Alexander Kirschner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  An incidence of large foodborne outbreak associated with Vibrio mimicus.

Authors:  T Chitov; P Kirikaew; P Yungyune; N Ruengprapan; K Sontikun
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Optimization of multilocus sequence analysis for identification of species in the genus Vibrio.

Authors:  Michael W Gabriel; George Y Matsui; Robert Friedman; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  To eat or not to eat an endangered species: views of local residents and physicians on the safety of sea turtle consumption in northwestern Mexico.

Authors:  Jesse Senko; Wallace J Nichols; James Perran Ross; Adam S Willcox
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  Differentiation of environmental and clinical isolates of Vibrio mimicus from Vibrio cholerae by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis.

Authors:  V V Vieira; L F Teixeira; A C Vicente; H Momen; C A Salles
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Infectious CTXPhi and the vibrio pathogenicity island prophage in Vibrio mimicus: evidence for recent horizontal transfer between V. mimicus and V. cholerae.

Authors:  E F Boyd; K E Moyer; L Shi; M K Waldor
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.441

10.  Sources of Vibrio mimicus contamination of turtle eggs.

Authors:  M T Acuña; G Díaz; H Bolaños; C Barquero; O Sánchez; L M Sánchez; G Mora; A Chaves; E Campos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.