Literature DB >> 8919281

Changes in angiographic features and the ankle/brachial pressure index of femorodistal arterial bypass grafts during knee flexion.

N Akiyama1, A Furutani, T Kuga, K Fujioka, N Zempo, K Esato.   

Abstract

Systolic ankle pressure was measured in limbs in the extended and 90 degrees-flexed positions in three groups of patients who had undergone below-knee femorodistal arterial bypass. Group 1 consisted of eight limbs in seven patients who had received an autologous saphenous vein (ASV) graft; group 2 consisted of seven limbs in seven patients who had received a ringed expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) graft; and group 3 consisted of five limbs in five patients who had received a reinforced biosynthetic borine collagen vascular (Omniflow) graft. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography was performed within 3 months of implantation. The ankle/brachial index (ABI) was significantly lower when the knee was flexed than when it was extended in group 1 and 3, but not in group 2. The ABI flexion in group 1 was similar to that in group 2. Morphologic changes such as kinking were demonstrated angiographically in groups 1 and 3. Given that the ABIs in groups 1 and 2 were similar with the knee flexed, despite the morphologic changes in group 1, we concluded that saphenous vein and ringed ePTFE grafts are more durable when subjected to acute knee flexion than Omniflow grafts. Thus, as graft failure is unlikely to result from kinking as a result of knee flexion alone, further clinical studies are required to elucidate the precise causes of graft failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8919281     DOI: 10.1007/bf00311774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  12 in total

1.  SALVAGE OF EXTREMITIES BY VEIN GRAFTS IN FAR-ADVANCED PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE.

Authors:  J A MANNICK; D M HUME
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Autogenous saphenous vein bypass grafts in femoropopliteal obliterative arterial disease.

Authors:  R R LINTON; R C DARLING
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Femoropopliteal bypass to the isolated popliteal segment: is polytetrafluoroethylene graft acceptable?

Authors:  F J Veith; S K Gupta; V D Daly
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Comparison of above-knee and below-knee anastomosis in femoropopliteal bypass grafts.

Authors:  D C Brewster; A J LaSalle; R C Darling
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1981-08

5.  Surgical principles and polytetrafluoroethylene.

Authors:  H C Stansel; J E Fenn; M D Tilson; H Laks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1979-11

6.  Ankle pressure changes in distal bypass grafts during knee flexion.

Authors:  S J Burnham; D P Flanigan; J J Goodreau; J S Yao; J J Bergan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Below-knee bypass for limb salvage. Comparison of autogenous saphenous vein, polytetrafluoroethylene, and composite dacron-autogenous vein grafts.

Authors:  R W Hobson; J A O'Donnell; Z Jamil; K Mehta
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-07

8.  Preliminary experience with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts.

Authors:  W C Johnson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  The role of graft material in femorotibial bypass grafts.

Authors:  W H Edwards; J L Mulherin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of conduits for leg revascularization.

Authors:  R D Weisel; K W Johnston; R J Baird; A D Drezner; T K Oates; I H Lipton
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.