Literature DB >> 8919215

Practical aspects of acoustic rhinometry: problems and solutions.

E W Fisher1, D P Morris, J M Biemans, C R Palmer, V J Lund.   

Abstract

Acoustic rhinometry now has an established place in the rhinology laboratory as a measure of nasal geometry. We aimed to investigate several aspects of technique in order to offer some guidance on preferred procedures. We studied the effects of nosepiece seal quality, nosepiece aperture diameter, angle of inclination of the wave tube (in two planes), palate position and inter-observer variation on the nasal area-distance function. One hundred nasal cavities in adults and children were examined: 50 normal and 50 pathological. Each factor was examined intensively in 20 cavities, and reproducibility data obtained on all 100 cavities. The baseline mean coefficient of variation for nasal cavity volume (V1) was 6% and for minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) was 8%. Altering the angle of incidence of the wave tube in the axial and coronal planes caused considerable change in the traces from the anterior nasal cavity, including the I- and C-notches, and affected the MCA significantly (p < 0.01, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Using a small nosepiece aperture accentuated the I-notch, and the nosepiece in some cases became the site of the minimal area. Addition of a silicone-based sealant to the standard nosepiece caused a mean reduction of 14.3% in nasal volume, if the seal quality was suspected to be suboptimal. Nasopharyngeal volume decreased by a mean of 28.6% when the palate is raised by the modified Valsalva manoeuvre, and no difference was found between quiet oral respiration and cessation of nasal respiration. Acoustic rhinometry is sensitive to minor changes in the details of technique. We recommend using an intermediate range of angles in both planes, the addition of a sealant where the nosepiece seal is suspect, use of newer improved nosepieces and synchronizing readings with either cessation of nasal respiration or with quiet oral respiration. There is a pressing need for international agreement on such details if collaboration and clinical application of acoustic rhinometry is to flourish.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8919215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

1.  Intranasal challenge with aspirin in the diagnosis of aspirin intolerant asthma: evaluation of nasal response by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  J Casadevall; P J Ventura; J Mullol; C Picado
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  The relationship between nasal resistance to airflow and the airspace minimal cross-sectional area.

Authors:  Guilherme J M Garcia; Benjamin M Hariri; Ruchin G Patel; John S Rhee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Adult nasal volumes assessed by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Adriana de Oliveira Camargo Gomes; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio-Teixeira; Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

4.  Velar activity in individuals with velopharyngeal insufficiency assessed by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Bruna Mara Adorno Marmontel Araújo; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio Teixeira; Andressa Sharllene Carneiro da Silva; Ivy Kiemle Trindade-Suedam
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.