Literature DB >> 8918879

Three distinct signalling responses by murine fibroblasts to genotoxic stress.

Z G Liu1, R Baskaran, E T Lea-Chou, L D Wood, Y Chen, M Karin, J Y Wang.   

Abstract

Genotoxic stress triggers signalling pathways that mediate either the protection or killing of affected cells. Whereas induction of p53 involves events in the cell nucleus, the activation of transcription factors AP-1 and NF-kappaB by ultraviolet radiation is mediated through membrane-associated signalling proteins, ruling out a nuclear signal. An early event in AP-1 induction by ultraviolet radiation is activation of Jun kinases (JNKs), which mediate the induction of the immediate-early genes c-jun and c-fos. The JNKs have also been proposed to mediate the apoptopic response to genotoxins. The non-receptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl is also activated by genotoxic stress. To understand the relationship between these events, we compared the activation of p53, JNK and c-Abl by several DNA-damaging agents in murine fibroblasts. We found that whereas p53 was induced by every genotoxic stimulus tested, c-Abl was activated by most stimuli except ultraviolet irradiation and JNK was strongly stimulated only by ultraviolet light and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulphonate. Activation of JNK by this alkylating agent was normal in c-Abl-null cells but was reduced in c-Src-null cells. Unlike p53 induction, c-Abl activation occurs in the S phase of the cell cycle and does not affect cell proliferation. These findings show that signals generated by genotoxins are transduced by multiple, independent pathways. Only p53 appears to be a universal sensor of genotoxic stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918879     DOI: 10.1038/384273a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  93 in total

Review 1.  The complexity of radiation stress responses: analysis by informatics and functional genomics approaches.

Authors:  A J Fornace; S A Amundson; M Bittner; T G Myers; P Meltzer; J N Weinsten; J Trent
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  1999

2.  A nuclear tyrosine phosphorylation circuit: c-Jun as an activator and substrate of c-Abl and JNK.

Authors:  D Barilá; R Mangano; S Gonfloni; J Kretzschmar; M Moro; D Bohmann; G Superti-Furga
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-01-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Stimulation of p53 DNA binding by c-Abl requires the p53 C terminus and tetramerization.

Authors:  Y Nie; H H Li; C M Bula; X Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Phosphorylation in transcription: the CTD and more.

Authors:  T Riedl; J M Egly
Journal:  Gene Expr       Date:  2000

5.  c-Abl regulates p53 levels under normal and stress conditions by preventing its nuclear export and ubiquitination.

Authors:  R V Sionov; S Coen; Z Goldberg; M Berger; B Bercovich; Y Ben-Neriah; A Ciechanover; Y Haupt
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  p53-dependent cell death signaling in neurons.

Authors:  Richard S Morrison; Yoshito Kinoshita; Mark D Johnson; Weiqun Guo; Gwenn A Garden
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.996

7.  Mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase is required for genotoxic stress relief in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  R Ulm; E Revenkova; G P di Sansebastiano; N Bechtold; J Paszkowski
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Interaction between UV-damaged DNA binding activity proteins and the c-Abl tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  Feng Cong; Jean Tang; Byung Joon Hwang; Bao Q Vuong; Gilbert Chu; Stephen P Goff
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  A positive role for c-Abl in Atm and Atr activation in DNA damage response.

Authors:  X Wang; L Zeng; J Wang; J F L Chau; K P Lai; D Jia; A Poonepalli; M P Hande; H Liu; G He; L He; B Li
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 15.828

10.  c-Abl tyrosine kinase in the DNA damage response: cell death and more.

Authors:  V Meltser; M Ben-Yehoyada; Y Shaul
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 15.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.