Literature DB >> 8918858

Effect of mandatory radiology consultation on inpatient imaging use. A randomized controlled trial.

R L Bree1, E A Kazerooni, S J Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a mandatory radiology consultation service can decrease radiology resource use on inpatient internal medicine services. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Randomized controlled trial on 4 internal medicine services at a university hospital. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Six radiologists performed the intervention on 2 internal medicine services over a 12-month period. A total of 1022 patients were admitted to the 2 intervention services and 1178 patients were admitted to the 2 control services. Each was staffed by an attending internist and 3 house officers. INTERVENTION: Each radiology examination required approval by the attending radiologist before it was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative resource costs (relative value units [RVUs]), number of examinations per patient, proportion of patients with 1 or more tests, and mean length of stay (LOS).
RESULTS: Mean RVUs for the intervention group were 356.1, and for the control group, 336.0 (P=.5). Mean examinations per patient for both groups was 4.4. Mean LOS for the intervention group was 6.0 days, and for the control group, 6.1 days (P=.8).
CONCLUSIONS: An inpatient radiology consultation service, with a goal to reduce resource use, did not achieve its goal. A more appropriate use of time and expense for radiology utilization management may be in the outpatient setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  7 in total

1.  Radiologists' responses to inadequate referrals.

Authors:  Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Appropriateness: analysis of outpatient radiology requests.

Authors:  M Cristofaro; E Busi Rizzi; V Schininà; D Chiappetta; C Angeletti; C Bibbolino
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Vetting requests for body computed tomography.

Authors:  R L Harrison; B Housden; C Hay; A K Dixon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Does experience matter? A comparison of the practice of attendings and residents.

Authors:  Mary E Charlson; Jwala Karnik; Mitchell Wong; Charles E McCulloch; James P Hollenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Strategies for utilisation management of hospital services: a systematic review of interventions.

Authors:  Leila Doshmangir; Roghayeh Khabiri; Hossein Jabbari; Morteza Arab-Zozani; Edris Kakemam; Vladimir Sergeevich Gordeev
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 10.401

6.  Appropriateness of knee MRI prescriptions: clinical, economic and technical issues.

Authors:  F M Solivetti; A Guerrisi; N Salducca; F Desiderio; D Graceffa; G Capodieci; P Romeo; I Sperduti; S Canitano
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 7.  Radiology Consultation in the Era of Precision Oncology: A Review of Consultation Models and Services in the Tertiary Setting.

Authors:  Pamela J DiPiro; Katherine M Krajewski; Angela A Giardino; Marta Braschi-Amirfarzan; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.500

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.