Literature DB >> 8918835

Similarities and differences in the way transmembrane-type ligands interact with the Elk subclass of Eph receptors.

R Brambilla1, K Brückner, D Orioli, A D Bergemann, J G Flanagan, R Klein.   

Abstract

The Eph family of receptor tyrosine kinases and their cell surface bound ligands have been implicated in a number of developmental processes, including axon pathfinding and fasciculation, as well as patterning in the central nervous system. To better understand the complex signaling events taking place, we have undertaken a comparative analysis of ligand-receptor interactions between a subset of ligands, those that are tethered to the cell surface via a transmembrane domain, and a subset of Eph receptors, the so-called Elk subclass. Based on binding characteristics, receptor autophosphorylation, and cellular transformation assays, we find that the transmembrane-type ligands Lerk2 and Elf2 have common and specific receptors within the Elk subclass of receptors. The common receptors Cek10 and Elk bind and signal in response to Lerk2 and Elf2, whereas the Myk1 receptor is specific for Elf2. Elf2, however, fails to signal through Cek5 in a cellular transformation assay, suggesting that Lerk2 may be the preferred Cek5 ligand in vivo. A recently identified third transmembrane-type ligand, Elf3, specifically, but weakly, binds Cek10 and only induces focus formation when activated by C-terminal truncation. This suggests that the physiological Elf3 receptor may have yet to be identified. Knowledge regarding functional ligand-receptor interactions as presented in this study will be important for the design and interpretation of in vivo experiments, e.g., loss-of-function studies in transgenic mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918835     DOI: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci        ISSN: 1044-7431            Impact factor:   4.314


  10 in total

1.  Specification of distinct dopaminergic neural pathways: roles of the Eph family receptor EphB1 and ligand ephrin-B2.

Authors:  Y Yue; D A Widmer; A K Halladay; D P Cerretti; G C Wagner; J L Dreyer; R Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  PDZ interaction site in ephrinB2 is required for the remodeling of lymphatic vasculature.

Authors:  Taija Mäkinen; Ralf H Adams; John Bailey; Qiang Lu; Andrew Ziemiecki; Kari Alitalo; Rüdiger Klein; George A Wilkinson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Alterations in the thymocyte phenotype of EphB-deficient mice largely affect the double negative cell compartment.

Authors:  David Alfaro; Juan José Muñoz; Javier García-Ceca; Teresa Cejalvo; Eva Jiménez; Agustín Zapata
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Control of blood vessel identity: from embryo to adult.

Authors:  Tiffany T Fancher; Akihito Muto; Tamara N Fitzgerald; Dania Magri; David Gortler; Toshiya Nishibe; Alan Dardik
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2008-02-15

5.  Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses.

Authors:  E Stein; A A Lane; D P Cerretti; H O Schoecklmann; A D Schroff; R L Van Etten; T O Daniel
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Loss of cell adhesion in Xenopus laevis embryos mediated by the cytoplasmic domain of XLerk, an erythropoietin-producing hepatocellular ligand.

Authors:  T L Jones; L D Chong; J Kim; R H Xu; H F Kung; I O Daar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Specificity and sufficiency of EphB1 in driving the ipsilateral retinal projection.

Authors:  Timothy J Petros; Brikha R Shrestha; Carol Mason
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tissue-engineered vascular grafts demonstrate evidence of growth and development when implanted in a juvenile animal model.

Authors:  Matthew P Brennan; Alan Dardik; Narutoshi Hibino; Jason D Roh; Gregory N Nelson; Xenophon Papademitris; Toshiharu Shinoka; Christopher K Breuer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Host cell recognition by the henipaviruses: crystal structures of the Nipah G attachment glycoprotein and its complex with ephrin-B3.

Authors:  Kai Xu; Kanagalaghatta R Rajashankar; Yee-Peng Chan; Juha P Himanen; Christopher C Broder; Dimitar B Nikolov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Matrix Metalloproteases as Influencers of the Cells' Social Media.

Authors:  Daniel Young; Nabangshu Das; Anthonia Anowai; Antoine Dufour
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.