Literature DB >> 8918603

Protein recognition of adenylate: an example of a fuzzy recognition template.

S L Moodie1, J B Mitchell, J M Thornton.   

Abstract

The interaction between protein and adenylate in a non-homologous dataset of 18 high-resolution protein/nucleotide crystal structures is analysed. We find that each constituent of adenylate, adenine, ribose and phosphate, is substantially buried. Adenine has a largely hydrophobic protein interface, while phosphate interacts primarily with hydrophilic residues; ribose is intermediate. A detailed study of hydrogen bonding in these complexes shows hydrogen bonds between protein and adenine to be surprisingly scarce. There does not seem to be a conserved hydrogen-bonding pattern for adenine recognition. The hydrogen bonds that are seen have geometries close to energy minima found in our Distributed Multipole Analysis based model calculations. The experimental hydrogen-bonded geometries have a characteristic signature in our model energy calculations, with a dominant attractive electrostatic term. For stacked interactions, however, the dispersion energy dominates. Finally, we present the concept of a fuzzy recognition template, as a useful means of describing the protein/adenylate interactions presented here, which will also be a valuable concept for characterising other protein/ligand interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918603     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  27 in total

1.  The Hans Neurath Award lecture of The Protein Society: proteins-- a testament to physics, chemistry, and evolution.

Authors:  J M Thornton
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Statistical relationships among docking scores for different protein binding sites.

Authors:  R T Koehler; H O Villar
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  On the molecular discrimination between adenine and guanine by proteins.

Authors:  I Nobeli; R A Laskowski; W S Valdar; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  From protein structure to biochemical function?

Authors:  Roman A Laskowski; James D Watson; Janet M Thornton
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

5.  The newly discovered Q motif of DEAD-box RNA helicases regulates RNA-binding and helicase activity.

Authors:  Olivier Cordin; N Kyle Tanner; Monique Doère; Patrick Linder; Josette Banroques
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Structural basis for the activation of phenylalanine in the non-ribosomal biosynthesis of gramicidin S.

Authors:  E Conti; T Stachelhaus; M A Marahiel; P Brick
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-07-16       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  The cAMP binding domain: an ancient signaling module.

Authors:  Helen M Berman; Lynn F Ten Eyck; David S Goodsell; Nina M Haste; Alexandr Kornev; Susan S Taylor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins.

Authors:  Kengo Kinoshita; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Prediction of interacting single-stranded RNA bases by protein-binding patterns.

Authors:  Alexandra Shulman-Peleg; Maxim Shatsky; Ruth Nussinov; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0.

Authors:  Xiaolei Zhu; Yi Xiong; Daisuke Kihara
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.