Literature DB >> 8918496

Double dose-intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support for metastatic breast cancer: no improvement in progression-free survival by the sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin.

L J Ayash1, A Elias, G Schwartz, C Wheeler, J Ibrahim, B A Teicher, E Reich, D Warren, C Lynch, P Richardson, L Schnipper, E Frei, K Antman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Twenty-one percent of responding metastatic breast cancer patients remain progression-free a median 50 months following one intensification cycle of cyclophosphamide (6,000 mg/m2), thiotepa (500 mg/ m2), and carboplatin (800 mg/m2) (CTCb) with autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). This trial studied whether the sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by CTCb resulted in improved disease response and duration.
METHODS: Women with at least partial responses (PRS) to induction received melphalan (140 or 180 mg/ m2) with peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. They were monitored as outpatients. After recovery, patients were hospitalized for CTCb with marrow, PBPC, and G-CSF support.
RESULTS: Data on 67 women, at a median of 25 months from CTCb, were examined. After melphalan, 49 (73%) required admission for fever (89%), mucositis (35%), or infection (15%) (median stay, 8 days). All received CTCb. For the first 33 patients, the median days from start of melphalan to CTCb was 24. After liver toxicity (one death from venoocclusive disease [VOD]) developed in 11 patients during CTCb, the interval between intensifications was increased to 35 days without incident. Twenty-three patients (34%) are progression-free a median of 16 months post-CTCb. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and survival times for the whole group are estimated at 11 and 20 months, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Treatment with this sequence of high-dose melphalan followed by CTCb has not resulted in superior PFS to date, when compared with single-intensification CTCb. This report discusses factors related to patient selection, the role of induced drug resistance, and the schedule of administration of alkylating agenting that may adversely influence outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918496     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1996.14.11.2984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  5 in total

1.  Stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of tumor contamination.

Authors:  E A Stadtmauer; D E Tsai; C J Sickles; R Mick; S M Luger; D L Porter; P A Mangan; L M Schuchter; S J Schuster; E Y Loh; D A Magee; R A Sachs; M E Wall; J Moore; G P Buzby; E Zaleta; M Kamoun; L E Silberstein
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Stem-cell transplantation for the treatment of advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Yago Nieto; Roy B Jones; Elizabeth J Shpall
Journal:  Springer Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2004-09-11

3.  Survival in 12,653 breast cancer patients with extensive axillary lymph node metastasis in the anthracycline era.

Authors:  Shannon H Beal; Steve R Martinez; Robert J Canter; Steven L Chen; Vijay P Khatri; Richard J Bold
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Retrospective analysis of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Kim; Hyoung Jin Kang; Jeong Ah Park; Hyoung Soo Choi; Hee Young Shin; Hyo Seop Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  The fibrinolytic system facilitates tumor cell migration across the blood-brain barrier in experimental melanoma brain metastasis.

Authors:  George Perides; Yuzheng Zhuge; Tina Lin; Monique F Stins; Roderick T Bronson; Julian K Wu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.