Literature DB >> 8918379

Positive proximal resection margins after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and stomach: effect on survival and symptom recurrence.

C A Gall1, N A Rieger, D A Wattchow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the frequency, survival and symptomatic local recurrence rate of patients with a positive proximal resection margin in a series of patients having a resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus or stomach.
METHODS: A retrospective study of pathology reports and case notes. Survival and data on local recurrence were obtained from the patient or general practitioner.
RESULTS: Ten (11.5%) of 87 patients having a gastric or oesophageal resection for carcinoma had a positive proximal resection margin. All 10 patients underwent a palliative resection for late-stage disease. Nine were dead at an average 8.3 months (range 2-20 months) post-resection and one patient remains alive at 9 months. Only one of these 10 patients had evidence of a local recurrence with recurrent dysphagia prior to death at 11 months.
CONCLUSION: A high incidence of a positive proximal resection margin was found. This occurred in patients who underwent a palliative resection for late-stage disease, most of whom died before local recurrence became a problem. For patients recognized as having late-stage disease, surgery for symptom palliation need not be aggressive (such as to include a thoracotomy) because achieving microscopic clearance is unlikely to affect the long-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8918379     DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00732.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg        ISSN: 0004-8682


  8 in total

1.  ACP. Best Practice No 155. Guidelines for handling oesophageal biopsies and resection specimens and their reporting.

Authors:  N B Ibrahim
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Influence of a microscopic positive proximal margin in the treatment of gastric adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

Authors:  Jian-Guo Shen; Jae-Ho Cheong; Woo-Jin Hyung; Junuk Kim; Seung-Ho Choi; Sung-Hoon Noh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Raziee; Roberta Cardoso; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Natalie Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Influence of a positive proximal margin on oral intake in patients with palliative gastrectomy for far advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Tokunaga; Junya Kondo; Yusuke Taki; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  L H Moyes; J E Anderson; M J Forshaw
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome.

Authors:  Andrew P Barbour; Nabil P Rizk; Mithat Gonen; Laura Tang; Manjit S Bains; Valerie W Rusch; Daniel G Coit; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Effect of microscopic resection line disease on gastric cancer survival.

Authors:  S H Kim; M S Karpeh; D S Klimstra; D Leung; M F Brennan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  A critical appraisal of circumferential resection margins in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Bareld B Pultrum; Judith Honing; Justin K Smit; Hendrik M van Dullemen; Gooitzen M van Dam; Henk Groen; Harry Hollema; John Th M Plukker
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.344

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.