Literature DB >> 8917255

Low molecular weight heparin (reviparin) in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Results of a randomized, double-blind, unfractionated heparin and placebo-controlled, multicenter trial (REDUCE trial). Reduction of Restenosis After PTCA, Early Administration of Reviparin in a Double-Blind Unfractionated Heparin and Placebo-Controlled Evaluation.

K R Karsch1, M B Preisack, R Baildon, V Eschenfelder, D Foley, E J Garcia, M Kaltenbach, C Meisner, H K Selbmann, P W Serruys, M F Shiu, M Sujatta, R Bonan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The specific objective of the REDUCE trial was to evaluate the effect of low molecular weight heparin on the incidence and occurrence of restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA).
BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin and its low molecular weight fragments possess antiproliferative effects and have been shown to reduce neointimal smooth muscle cell migration and proliferation in response to vascular injury in experimental studies.
METHODS: The REDUCE trial is an international prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Twenty-six centers in Europe and Canada enrolled 625 patients with single-lesion coronary artery obstructions suitable for PTCA. Three hundred six patients received reviparin as a 7,000-U bolus before PTCA, followed by 10,500 U as an infusion over 24 h and then twice-daily 3,500-U subcutaneous application for 28 days. The 306 patients in the control group received a bolus of 10,000 U of unfractionated heparin followed by an infusion of 24,000 U over 24 h. These patients then underwent 28 days of subcutaneous placebo injections. The primary end points were efficacy (defined as a reduction in the incidence of major adverse events [i.e., death, myocardial infarction, need for reintervention or bypass surgery]), absolute loss of minimal lumen diameter and incidence of restenosis during the observation period of 30 weeks after PTCA.
RESULTS: Using the intention to treat analysis for all patients, 102 (33.3%) in the reviparin group and 98 (32%) in the control group have reached a primary clinical end point (relative risk [RR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.83 to 1.31, p = 0.707). Likewise, no difference in late loss of minimal lumen diameter was evident for both groups. Acute events within 24 h occurred in 12 patients (3.9%) in the reviparin group and 25 (8.2%) in the control group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92, p = 0.027) during or immediately after the initial procedure. In the control group, eight major bleeding complications occurred, and in the reviparin group, seven were observed within 35 days after PTCA.
CONCLUSIONS: Reviparin use during and after coronary angioplasty did not reduce the occurrence of major clinical events or the incidence of angiographic restenosis over 30 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917255     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00343-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  19 in total

Review 1.  Low molecular weight heparins in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  G Montalescot; M Cohen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  A guide to drug use during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Joseph K Choo; John J Young; Dean J Kereiakes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Low-molecular-weight heparins in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Rajan A Kadakia; Shravantika R Baimeedi; James J Ferguson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

4.  Phospholipid-Coated Hydrophobic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Enhance Thrombectomy by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound with Low Production of Embolism-Inducing Clot Debris.

Authors:  Nicholas T Blum; Ciara M Gyorkos; Spencer J Narowetz; Evan N Mueller; Andrew P Goodwin
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 5.  Reviparin: a review of its efficacy in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  K Wellington; K McClellan; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Heparin dose during percutaneous coronary intervention: how low dare we go?

Authors:  G Niccoli; A P Banning
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Modulating thrombotic potential in catheter-based percutaneous coronary and peripheral vascular interventions.

Authors:  James L Orford; Peter B Berger
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Recommendations on percutaneous coronary intervention for the reperfusion of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G Montalescot; H R Andersen; D Antoniucci; A Betriu; M J de Boer; L Grip; F J Neumann; M T Rothman
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Distinct yet complementary mechanisms of heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors on platelet activation and aggregation: implications for restenosis during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  J R S Day; I S Malik; A Weerasinghe; M Poullis; I Nadra; D O Haskard; K M Taylor; R C Landis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 10.  Unfractionated versus fractionated heparin for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Heidar Arjomand; Satish K Surabhi; Marc Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.