PURPOSE: Five to 20% of patients discontinue antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy because of adverse reactions. Careful reintroduction, however, may be considered if true drug allergy can be ruled out. Definitive assessment of such immunologically mediated reactions requires demonstration of either specific antibodies or sensitized lymphocytes. METHODS: We investigated whether skin patch tests (PTs) and in vitro lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPAs) were suitable for detection of allergy to carbamazepine (CBZ) and the possibly cross-reactive oxcarbazepine (OCBZ). Data of 65 patients displaying a wide range of possibly allergic side effects to CBZ were available for analysis. Data of CBZ users without any side effects and healthy volunteers served as controls. Both PTs and LPAs were done with CBZ, OCBZ and three metabolites [CBZ-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E), 10-monohydroxy-CBZ (MHD), and 10,11-dihydroxy-CBZ (DIOL)]. RESULTS: Positive PTs with CBZ were seen in 20% and with OCBZ in 14% of the patients. Positive LPA results with CBZ and OCBZ, respectively, were found in 40 and 19%. Both tests were positive in 14 and 7% of the patients. Cross-reactivity to OCBZ was seen in -40% of CBZ-reactive patients in both PTs and LPAs. CONCLUSION: These data illustrate the additional value of LPAs in the detection of CBZ allergy while showing that a major part of side effects to CBZ and OCBZ is not immunologically mediated, according to PTs and LPAs.
PURPOSE: Five to 20% of patients discontinue antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy because of adverse reactions. Careful reintroduction, however, may be considered if true drug allergy can be ruled out. Definitive assessment of such immunologically mediated reactions requires demonstration of either specific antibodies or sensitized lymphocytes. METHODS: We investigated whether skin patch tests (PTs) and in vitro lymphocyte proliferation assays (LPAs) were suitable for detection of allergy to carbamazepine (CBZ) and the possibly cross-reactive oxcarbazepine (OCBZ). Data of 65 patients displaying a wide range of possibly allergic side effects to CBZ were available for analysis. Data of CBZ users without any side effects and healthy volunteers served as controls. Both PTs and LPAs were done with CBZ, OCBZ and three metabolites [CBZ-10,11-epoxide (CBZ-E), 10-monohydroxy-CBZ (MHD), and 10,11-dihydroxy-CBZ (DIOL)]. RESULTS: Positive PTs with CBZ were seen in 20% and with OCBZ in 14% of the patients. Positive LPA results with CBZ and OCBZ, respectively, were found in 40 and 19%. Both tests were positive in 14 and 7% of the patients. Cross-reactivity to OCBZ was seen in -40% of CBZ-reactive patients in both PTs and LPAs. CONCLUSION: These data illustrate the additional value of LPAs in the detection of CBZallergy while showing that a major part of side effects to CBZ and OCBZ is not immunologically mediated, according to PTs and LPAs.
Authors: Abdelbaset A Elzagallaai; Sandra R Knowles; Michael J Rieder; John R Bend; Neil H Shear; Gideon Koren Journal: Mol Diagn Ther Date: 2009 Impact factor: 4.074
Authors: Abdelbaset A Elzagallaai; Sandra R Knowles; Michael J Rieder; John R Bend; Neil H Shear; Gideon Koren Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.606